Frequency Multiplier problem for a guitar tuner

  • Thread starter Thread starter steveyesterda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency Guitar
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design of a guitar tuner, specifically addressing the challenge of achieving sufficient frequency measurement accuracy for tuning purposes. Participants explore various methods to enhance the frequency counting capability of the circuit, including the use of phase-locked loops (PLLs) and alternative approaches to frequency multiplication.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their circuit design, which includes a microphone, low-pass filters, a crystal oscillator, and a comparator, but notes a limitation in frequency counting accuracy to 1Hz.
  • Another participant suggests that 1Hz sensitivity is adequate for amateur designs, referencing commercial tuners that operate at around 0.5Hz sensitivity.
  • A different participant emphasizes the need for greater accuracy, stating that the human ear can detect frequency differences of about 5 cents, which translates to approximately 1/4Hz, thus advocating for a solution that achieves this level of precision.
  • One suggestion involves using a PLL to achieve the desired frequency multiplication, although the original poster expresses uncertainty about the necessary components.
  • Another participant proposes using a higher-frequency crystal for the time-base instead of a PLL, suggesting that microcontroller oscillators can be calibrated effectively.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the sufficiency of 1Hz sensitivity for a guitar tuner, with some arguing it is acceptable while others advocate for higher accuracy. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to achieve the desired frequency multiplication and accuracy.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not reached a consensus on the specific components or methods to implement for frequency multiplication, and there are unresolved questions regarding the design's overall effectiveness and accuracy.

steveyesterda
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hello everyone

I am a physics student who is currently writing his dissertation on designing a guitar tuner.
So far I have designed my circuit to have a microphone that inputs the sound played from the string. Then a 6 way switch connected to low-pass filters filters out the unwanted higher harmonics. I have used a crystal oscillator at 32768Hz and divide it down to give me my 1 second pulse and used a commparator to change my input string frequency to a square wave.

The problem I am having is with the +/-1 count ambiguity of a frequency counter of this style. Currently, if I were to count that signal I would only be able to determine the unknown frequency to 1Hz, not accurate enough for a guitar tuner. I need to be counting to 2 decimal places, so my plan was to multiply this frequency by 100, but this is where I become stuck.

I have tried researching using a PLL (phase-locked loop) but I don't really understand which components and values I need to get this to work. Can someone please help me. :(

Or if anyone knows of an IC that would do this job for me, that would be even better! I have looked at this frequency multiplier
http://parts.digikey.com/1/parts/1174449-ic-pll-freq-multiplier-28-tssop-sn65lvds150pwr.html
but i don't know if that will give me the desired multiplication or if it i would need to add any other components to make this work.

Thanks PhysicsForum, any help is much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1hz sensitivity is enough, I think.
commertial tuners are sensitive to about 0.5 hz.
1 hz is fair for an amateur design.
 
hey, thanks for your reply.

Problem is, i have stated already that the human ear can tell the difference in frequency of about 5cents which on the low E string of a guitar corresponds to about 1/4Hz, an accuracy I need to be able to replicate.

Is there not a simple way to just increase the frequency x10 twice?

Thanks
 
steveyesterda, cool project.

It sounds like you're on the right track.

Of course, you could get to 1/4 Hz accuracy by triggering on the up and down portions of the square wave then sampling for 2 seconds, but I suppose you want even better than 1/4 Hz (plus faster sampling). PLL sounds like the way to go, I don't know component specifics, but there's got to be sample frequency counter (essentially what you're building) schematics out there. Best of luck, steveyesterda.
 
Rather than use a PLL (and being completely ignorant of your design) can you just use a higher-frequency crystal for your time-base? Even the internal oscillator of most microcontrollers can be calibrated fairly well, assuming fairly consistent voltage, and temperature.

EDIT: And welcome to PhysicsForums!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K