Friction: Does Contact Area Affect Force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter student85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between contact area and friction force, specifically the formula F=uN, where F is the friction force, u is the friction coefficient, and N is the normal force. Participants clarify that while a larger contact area may suggest greater friction, it is actually the normal force that determines friction, as the area does not directly influence the friction coefficient. The conclusion is that friction is proportional to the normal force, and any increase in contact area necessitates a proportional increase in normal force to maintain the same pressure, ultimately leading to no net increase in friction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly Newton's laws of motion.
  • Familiarity with the formula for friction, F=uN.
  • Knowledge of pressure and its relationship with force and area.
  • Basic grasp of kinetic and static friction principles.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the relationship between pressure and friction in different materials.
  • Explore the concept of normal force and its implications in various physical scenarios.
  • Study experimental methods for measuring friction coefficients in different contexts.
  • Investigate the effects of surface texture on frictional forces.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of friction and its applications in real-world scenarios.

student85
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
The formula for the calculation of friction, F=uN, where u is the friction coeficient, doesn't include anything related with its area of contact.
That is, to what I know, a rectangle for example, weighing 3 kg that is real long and has little height, has a big area of contact with the surface it is on, compared to a block for example, of the same weight . I think that the rectangle is harder to move because of its much bigger area of contact.
I know that because it has a big area of contact then its weight is distributed and so it has less Newtons per cubic m.
However I still think that the rectangle should have a greater friction than the cube..am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are wrong, but at least you are thinking.

The larger area will be compensated for by a smaller density. Ultimately in kinetics we adopt the model of a point particle of mass 3kg, and measure the normal force on this. However, the normal force has no component on area simply because the area doesn't matter.

Think of something like a car. A car has a surface area of contact of maybe .5m^2 (tires), but if you got rid of the entire car and just had the 4 tires, it would be much easier to move. The surface area plays no role in this calculation.
 
student85 said:
The formula for the calculation of friction, F=uN, where u is the friction coeficient, doesn't include anything related with its area of contact.
That is, to what I know, a rectangle for example, weighing 3 kg that is real long and has little height, has a big area of contact with the surface it is on, compared to a block for example, of the same weight . I think that the rectangle is harder to move because of its much bigger area of contact.
I know that because it has a big area of contact then its weight is distributed and so it has less Newtons per cubic m.
However I still think that the rectangle should have a greater friction than the cube..am I right?
Experimentally it has been shown that the kinetic friction force and maximum static friction force are proportional to the normal pressure x area of contact. The pressure determines how strongly the two surfaces 'mesh'. The area determines the extent of contact of the two surfaces. But pressure x area = total Normal force.

So you are right in the sense that a larger surface with the same pressure will have the greater friction force. But in order to have the same pressure, normal force must increase in proportion to area. So in the end, it is easier to think of friction as simply proportional to normal force.

AM
 
Thanks guys
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
61
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K