Friction forces on the tires of a moving car

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter titasdasplus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Friction Velocity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of friction forces acting on the tires of a moving car, specifically addressing whether static or kinetic friction is at play when a car is in motion. Participants explore concepts related to friction, motion, and forces acting on vehicles, including the effects of aerodynamic drag and rolling resistance.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that when a car is moving, the velocity at the contact point between the tires and the ground is zero, suggesting that static friction must be acting.
  • Others argue that kinetic friction applies only when the wheels lock and the car skids, emphasizing that a car can move at constant velocity on a frictionless surface without active friction forces.
  • It is noted that cars are designed to utilize static friction for acceleration and braking, with kinetic friction occurring only under conditions of slipping.
  • Some participants highlight that aerodynamic drag requires a constant force to maintain velocity, implying that static friction is necessary to overcome this drag, even on a frictionless surface.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of aerodynamic drag, including its dependence on speed and the characteristics of the gas through which the car moves.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the mentor's assertion regarding kinetic friction is incorrect, but there is no consensus on the implications of friction in relation to aerodynamic drag and the conditions under which static or kinetic friction applies.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the nuances of friction forces, particularly in relation to constant velocity and the effects of aerodynamic drag. The discussion includes various assumptions about ideal conditions, such as frictionless surfaces and the role of rolling resistance.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying physics, particularly in the areas of mechanics and dynamics, as well as individuals interested in automotive engineering and the principles of motion and forces.

titasdasplus
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
When a car is moving the velocity of the connection point between the car and the ground is zero. So static friction must be act here ,mustn't it ? But my mentor said ,it is kinetic friction. Which is correct? If kinetic friction, why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
titasdasplus said:
When a car is moving the velocity of the connection point between the car and the ground is zero. So static friction must be act here ,mustn't it ? But my mentor said ,it is kinetic friction. Which is correct? If kinetic friction, why?
Your mentor is completely wrong. There is no active friction force on a car moving at constant velocity. A car could move normally at constant velocity on a frictionless surface.

When the car accelerates, turns or brakes, static friction acts to provide the external force. Only if the wheels lock and the car skids does kinetic friction apply.

Note that tires are made of rubber with a high coefficient of friction. This allows greater acceleration and grip on the road. This would be an absurd design if kinetic friction were acting while driving.

A car moving on a flat surface will gradually lose speed through air resistance and rolling resistance, which is caused by the interaction of the tires deforming slightly against the surface. I.e. the tires cannot remain perfectly circular. But not by kinetic friction.
 
titasdasplus said:
When a car is moving the velocity of the connection point between the car and the ground is zero. So static friction must be act here ,mustn't it ? But my mentor said ,it is kinetic friction. Which is correct? If kinetic friction, why?
Cars are designed to ideally use static friction with the road to accelerate or brake. If you accelerate or brake too hard, the tires will slip and you have kinetic friction. You also have rolling resistance, which is not road friction but a combined effect of deformations and internal frictions.
 
PeroK said:
Your mentor is completely wrong. There is no active friction force on a car moving at constant velocity. A car could move normally at constant velocity on a frictionless surface.

Although I agree that the mentor is completely wrong, I don't understand the part after that. There is aerodynamic drag acting on the car which means that a constant force is necessary to maintain constant velocity. This means a car cannot maintain constant velocity at a frictionless surface, you need the friction between the tire and road to overcome the aerodynamic drag. This is of course still static friction.
 
Arjan82 said:
Although I agree that the mentor is completely wrong, I don't understand the part after that. There is aerodynamic drag acting on the car which means that a constant force is necessary to maintain constant velocity. This means a car cannot maintain constant velocity at a frictionless surface, you need the friction between the tire and road to overcome the aerodynamic drag. This is of course still static friction.
Well, I did say "could" rather than "would". We'd also need no air resistance for the already hypothetical scenario to apply.
 
PeroK said:
Well, I did say "could" rather than "would".
That's just too subtle for me to pick up 😆
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Arjan82 said:
Although I agree that the mentor is completely wrong, I don't understand the part after that. There is aerodynamic drag acting on the car which means that a constant force is necessary to maintain constant velocity. This means a car cannot maintain constant velocity at a frictionless surface, you need the friction between the tire and road to overcome the aerodynamic drag. This is of course still static friction.
Can you tell me about aerodynamic drag?
 
titasdasplus said:
Can you tell me about aerodynamic drag?
That is a pretty open ended question. What do you want to know?

Aerodymamic drag is a force that opposes the motion of an object through a gas. The faster the object moves relative to the gas, the larger the drag force becomes.

At low speeds where not much energy is imparted to the gas, aerodynamic drag scales linearly with relative velocity. The drag in this regime depends on the viscosity of the gas.

At higher speeds, turbulence comes into play and aerodymic drag scales quadratically with relative velocity. The drag in this regime depends on the density of the gas. Cars on the highway typically operate in the quadratic regime.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K