-friction Is Independant Of Surface Area-

AI Thread Summary
Friction is independent of surface area because it primarily depends on the nature of the surfaces in contact and the normal force acting between them. In rolling motion, friction converts translational kinetic energy into rotational energy without energy loss, while sliding results in kinetic energy being lost as heat due to friction doing work on the sliding object. The particle in contact with the surface during rolling is momentarily at rest, meaning friction does no work and does not change the system's kinetic energy. Conversely, in sliding, the contact point has a non-zero velocity, allowing friction to perform work and dissipate energy. Understanding these principles clarifies why rolling is more efficient than sliding.
arunk8186
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
----friction Is Independant Of Surface Area------

>> can anyone tel y friction is independant of surface area/length ...

thx an regards,

arun
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thank u sir ...to rephrase my question to get a still better explnation (wit regard to myself) ...

>> why is rolling better than sliding ??

thx and regards,

arun
 
Rolling is better than sliding, because in rolling, friction merely CONVERTS translational kinetic energy into rotational energy without net energy loss, wheres in sliding, the object loses kinetic energy.
 
thank u sir,
my question is why does while sliding ,kinetic energy is lost as (friction) heat energy...why not while rollin?

thanks and regards,

arun
 
Let S be a system of N particles, and let \vec{F}_{i} be the net force acting upon the i'th particle.
The system's S rate of change of kinetic energy equals the sum of the particles' rates of change of kinetic energy.
Thus, if K_{i} is the kinetic energy of the i'th particle, the rate of change is:
\frac{dK_{i}}{dt}=\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{m_{i}\vec{v}_{i}^{2}}{2})=m_{i}\vec{a}_{i}\cdot\vec{v}_{i}=\vec{F}_{i}\cdot\vec{v}_{i}
where \vec{v}_{i},\vec{a}_{i},m_{i} is the i'th particle's velocity, acceleration and mass, respectively.

Now, the frictional force acting upon an object (or system S) acts upon the the "particle" directly in contact with the ground. Since the particle at the contact point is MOMENTARILY AT REST, its velocity is 0, and hence, the frictional force acting upon it cannot change its OR THE REST OF THE SYSTEM's kinetic energy! Otherwise stated, in rolling, friction does NO WORK.

In sliding, however, the particle at the contact point has a non-zero velocity, and hence, the friction force does non-zero work on the particle, and hence on the system as well.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top