Frictional accelerations greater than one G

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LareeRudi
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the phenomenon of dragsters achieving frictional accelerations greater than one G, exploring the mechanics behind such high acceleration rates, and questioning traditional physics teachings regarding friction coefficients. Participants share personal experiences, observations, and hypotheses related to the acceleration capabilities of drag racing vehicles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that dragsters can achieve accelerations of 1.5 to 4.0 Gs, particularly during the initial phase of a race, challenging the traditional understanding that the maximum frictional force is limited to 1 G.
  • One participant suggests that the spinning of the tires may contribute to increased forward force, while another counters that this could lead to kinetic friction, which is typically less than static friction.
  • There are claims that downforce generated by exhaust or potential vacuum effects could enhance tire grip, although some participants express skepticism about the significance of these effects.
  • Participants discuss data from a referenced paper indicating that top fuel dragsters maintain high acceleration throughout the race, although there is disagreement about whether acceleration decreases with increasing speed.
  • One participant mentions that modern racing tires can have friction coefficients exceeding 1, with some dragster tires reportedly reaching values as high as 5 during dynamic deformation at launch.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of the claim that friction coefficients cannot exceed 1, with references to sources that challenge this notion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the mechanisms behind the high accelerations of dragsters, with multiple competing views on the role of friction, downforce, and tire dynamics remaining unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the mathematical calculations and the definitions of friction coefficients, with some suggesting that traditional physics teachings may not fully account for the complexities involved in drag racing dynamics.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying vehicle dynamics, motorsports engineering, or the physics of friction and acceleration.

  • #31
On the lines of 'duck tape', I could suggest that, in order to get higher than g friction forces, you probably need even more engine power - to do the 'unsticking' as well as the accelerating.
There may be figures which show this. It's a bit like the 'design speed' idea with boat hulls; over a certain speed, a displacement hull needs wildly increasing powers to go faster and faster.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
OmCheeto said:
I was also going to ask the question: "What is the coefficient of friction of duct tape stuck to something, and how much force is required to peel it from the surface?"
Dragsters almost always do a burn out before the race, heating up the tires, making their surfaces fly paper sticky.

Then again, dragsters don't actually use that stickyness in the first meters.
In the first meters the tires are spinning furiously. In all other forms of car racing you lose acceleration if you have wheel spin at the start.

Are dragster tires shredded after a single run?
 
  • #33
Q

Cleonis said:
Then again, dragsters don't actually use that stickyness in the first meters.
In the first meters the tires are spinning furiously. In all other forms of car racing you lose acceleration if you have wheel spin at the start.

Are dragster tires shredded after a single run?

Yeah, considering the engine basically needs a rebuild after each run (for a top fuel dragster) the life of a tyre is 1 run.

The aim is to get a slight amount of wheel spin on all starts, this is because if you don't the tyre can bite and it bogs the engine down.
 
  • #34


xxChrisxx said:
Yeah, considering the engine basically needs a rebuild after each run (for a top fuel dragster) the life of a tyre is 1 run.

The aim is to get a slight amount of wheel spin on all starts, this is because if you don't the tyre can bite and it bogs the engine down.

So tyre = clutch, effctively?
 
  • #35


sophiecentaur said:
So tyre = clutch, effctively?

Err, the line isn't as sharp as that. They usually have torque converters that are designed to lock up in a specific way to just make the tyre have a certain amount of wheel spin for best acceleration. This is so the driver can lauch at/close to full thottle.

If they get the clutch wrong for the conditions, the engine will either bog down (revs will drop off) or the tyres will just spin away. You can see when they get it wrong as the tyre screws itsself up, and the car bounces around wildly.

A drag tyre really is an amazing piece of kit. It not only has to act like a tyre, but acts like a secondary clutch and a gearing system as well.

Heres a nice viedo demonstating what I'm decribing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNszt39F3ns&feature=related
 
  • #36
and just for the record, I did not write, nor did I check the wiki entry on friction before I made my post:

wiki on friction said:
Coefficients of friction range from near zero to greater than one – under good conditions, a tire on concrete may have a coefficient of friction of 1.7.[citation needed]

When the surfaces are conjoined, Coulomb friction becomes a very poor approximation (for example, adhesive tape resists sliding even when there is no normal force, or a negative normal force). In this case, the frictional force may depend strongly on the area of contact. Some drag racing tires are adhesive in this way.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friction"

I swear to god I didn't
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
18K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K