Frobenius solution to a diff-eq

  • Thread starter Thread starter IniquiTrance
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frobenius
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding two Frobenius series solutions to the differential equation 2xy'' + 3y' - y = 0. Participants are exploring the nature of the solutions and the validity of their approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find roots and a recurrence relation, but questions arise regarding the validity of the solutions derived. Some participants express skepticism about the form of the solutions, particularly the presence of \sqrt{2x} in both solutions. Others discuss the implications of the roots found and the nature of power series solutions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the correctness of the proposed solutions and discussing the implications of the recurrence relation. There is a recognition of the need for clarification on the nature of the solutions, with some guidance provided on how to check the validity of the solutions using Mathematica.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential confusion with Mathematica's interpretation of the differential equation and the need for proper formatting in commands. Participants are also grappling with the implications of the roots found in relation to the expected form of the solutions.

IniquiTrance
Messages
185
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find 2 Frobenius series solutions to the following differential equation:

2xy'' + 3y' - y = 0

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I got r = -1/2 and 0 as roots.

Recurrence relation:

http://image.cramster.com/answer-board/image/cramster-equation-200951755626337813656283812509812.gif

I got the following solutions:

http://image.cramster.com/answer-board/image/cramster-equation-2009517550266337813622621312505598.gif
http://image.cramster.com/answer-board/image/cramster-equation-2009517551276337813628747875004691.gif

According to mathematica, these aren't the right solutions.

What am I doing wrong?

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's easy to see by plugging into the equation that those are NOT solutions to equation. Further since one of the solutions for r is 0, I don't see how you can get [itex]\sqrt{2x}[/itex] in both solutions- one should be a standard power series.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
It's easy to see by plugging into the equation that those are NOT solutions to equation. Further since one of the solutions for r is 0, I don't see how you can get [itex]\sqrt{2x} in both solutions- one should be a standard power series.[/itex]
[itex] <br /> It is a power series, I pulled out a radical so as to make it fit the form of sinh's power series.<br /> <br /> Do you disagree with my recurrence relation?<br /> <br /> Thanks for the response.[/itex]
 
HallsofIvy said:
It's easy to see by plugging into the equation that those are NOT solutions to equation.

Really?

[tex]y_1(x)=\frac{a_0}{\sqrt{2x}}\sinh(\sqrt{2x})\implies y_1'(x)=\frac{-a_0}{2\sqrt{2}x^{3/2}}\sinh(\sqrt{2x})+\frac{a_0}{2x}\cosh(\sqrt{2x})[/tex]

[tex]\implies y''(x)=\frac{-3a_0}{4x^2}\cosh(\sqrt{2x})+\frac{3a_0}{4\sqrt{2}x^{5/2}}\sinh(\sqrt{2x})+\frac{a_0}{2\sqrt{2}x^{3/2}}\sinh(\sqrt{2x})[/tex]

[tex]\implies 2xy_1''(x)+3y_1'(x)-y_1(x)=\left(\frac{-3a_0}{2x}\cosh(\sqrt{2x})+\frac{3a_0}{2\sqrt{2}x^{3/2}}\sinh(\sqrt{2x})+\frac{a_0}{\sqrt{2x}}\sinh(\sqrt{2x})\right)[/tex]

[tex]+\left(\frac{-3a_0}{2\sqrt{2}x^{3/2}}\sinh(\sqrt{2x})+\frac{3a_0}{2x}\cosh(\sqrt{2x})\right)-\left(\frac{a_0}{\sqrt{2x}}\sinh(\sqrt{2x})\right)=0[/tex]And y_2(x) also satisfies the DE

Further since one of the solutions for r is 0, I don't see how you can get [itex]\sqrt{2x}[/itex] in both solutions- one should be a standard power series.

[tex]y_1(x)=\frac{a_0}{\sqrt{2x}}\sinh(\sqrt{2x})=a_0\left(1+\frac{x}{3}+\frac{x^2}{630}+\ldots\right)[/tex]

Is a regular power series:wink: (just multiply the series for [itex]sinh(\sqrt{2x})[/itex] by [itex]\frac{a_0}{\sqrt{2x}}[/itex] )
 
IniquiTrance said:
I got the following solutions:

http://image.cramster.com/answer-board/image/cramster-equation-2009517550266337813622621312505598.gif
http://image.cramster.com/answer-board/image/cramster-equation-2009517551276337813628747875004691.gif

According to mathematica, these aren't the right solutions.

Mathematica probably gave the total general solution as [tex]y(x)=\frac{e^{\sqrt{2} \sqrt{x}} C[1]}{\sqrt{x}}-\frac{e^{-\sqrt{2} \sqrt{x}} C[2]}{\sqrt{2} \sqrt{x}}[/tex]...correct?

Which is actually equivalent to the linear combination of your two solutions with [itex]C[1]=\frac{a_0}{2\sqrt{2}}+\frac{b_0}{2}[/itex] and [itex]C[2]=\frac{b_0}{\sqrt{2}}-\frac{a_0}{2}[/itex], since, by definition, [itex]\sinh(u)=\frac{1}{2}(e^u-e^{-u})[/itex] and [itex]\cosh(u)=\frac{1}{2}(e^u+e^{-u})[/itex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh, dear, oh, dear!:blushing:
 
Thanks!

http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/7167/71268782.jpg

I couldn't make heads or tails of that, and couldn't get the confirmation I needed.

I then tried plugging the result straight into the diff-eq, and mathematica likewise wasn't returning 0 as the answer, which spooked me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
IniquiTrance said:
Thanks!

http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/7167/71268782.jpg

I couldn't make heads or tails of that, and couldn't get the confirmation I needed.

I then tried plugging the result straight into the diff-eq, and mathematica likewise wasn't returning 0 as the answer, which spooked me.

In the above DSolve command, you need to use a "*" between x and y''[x] (i.e. [itex]2x*y''[x][/itex]), Mathematica interprets xy''[x] as the second derivative of a function called "xy"

As for checking that your solution satisfies the DE, try using FullSimplify[2x*y''[x]+3y'[x]-y[x]] after defining your y[x]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ah, now that makes perfect sense! Thanks for your help.
 
  • #10
You're Welcome!:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K