I Frontiers in Physics had 2 papers quest. Bell's theorem, any othrs?

ndvcxk123
Messages
47
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
My understanding is that other "Frontiers" Journals have been criticized for lax review policies. Am in another field, so I cannot judge the papers myself. Sorry, don't have refs., assume they are well known.
One is fr. worker at U. Karlsruhe, another fr. Israeli res. The latter argued findings can be integrated into classical physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's kind of hard for people here to judge papers, without links or references to them, or even the names of their authors.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and vanhees71
ndvcxk123 said:
assume they are well known….
Sorry, bad assumption.

This thread is closed. You can start a new when you have links to the papers.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and vanhees71

Thread 'Schrödinger equation and classical wave equation'

Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
View full post »

Thread 'Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
View full post »

Thread 'Is Maxwell's electromagnetism an effective (field) theory?'

Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Bell's theorem claimed to be refuted - paper published by EPL
2
Replies
50
Views
6K
I Is Bell's Theorem Inconsistent with Quantum Mechanics?
2
Replies
55
Views
8K
I Looking For Help Understanding Bell's Theorem, Hidden Variables & QM
2
Replies
80
Views
7K
B The match rates in Bell Tests -- Lower than 50%?
Replies
28
Views
2K
Bell's theorem mathematical content
Replies
35
Views
4K
I Bell's Theorem - why product of (2)spins can be +1 (Griffith's text)
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Bell vs Kolmogorov: Unravelling Probability Theory Limits
2
Replies
93
Views
7K
I Born rule as an axiom or as a theorem?
Replies
7
Views
3K
B Why do photon polarization experiments show similar outcomes in different situations?
Replies
11
Views
2K
I Bell's theorem and Superdeterminism
Replies
16
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top