FTL Communication: The Long Pole Experiment & Modification

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter aademarco
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Ftl Pole
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of faster-than-light (FTL) communication using a hypothetical long pole and later a single atom. Participants explore the implications of physical forces and information propagation at both macroscopic and atomic levels, questioning whether FTL communication could be achieved under these scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a thought experiment involving a 1 light year long pole to test FTL communication through push and pull Morse Code.
  • Another participant argues that pushing the pole does not result in instantaneous communication, as the force propagates at or below the speed of light.
  • A follow-up question is raised about using a single atom for similar communication, questioning if the same limitations apply due to atomic structure and interatomic forces.
  • One participant clarifies that at the atomic level, the concept of "push" is not applicable, as forces are mediated by fields that propagate at light speed or slower.
  • Another participant acknowledges the difficulty in visualizing atomic movement and agrees that changes in fields are limited to sub-luminal speeds.
  • A participant reflects on their past misconceptions about atomic structures, emphasizing the importance of questioning and revising preconceived notions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that communication cannot occur faster than light, whether through a pole or an atom. However, there is ongoing exploration of the implications of atomic structure and interatomic forces, indicating some unresolved aspects of the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the visualization of atomic interactions and the limitations imposed by the speed of information propagation in fields. The discussion does not resolve the complexities of atomic behavior in relation to FTL communication.

aademarco
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Hello!
It was some time ago on one of my visits to this forum where I saw a thought experiment about achieving faster than light communication using an impractically long pole of sorts. For example, practicality aside, if we were to construct a pole with the length of 1 light year, and have an observer at each end of said pole, could they send a form of push and pull Morse Code communication instantaneously regardless of the time it took to set up the system? When the pole is pushed from one end, 1 light year away at the other end of the pole, will they see the corresponding push instantaneously?

The answer to the above question after some research I found to be: No. You Cannot. The reasoning is that when you push on your end of the pole, you are actually pushing the atoms on your end of the pole against the rest of the atoms in the pole towards its other end, which subsequently push the atoms adjacent to them and so on, and that pushing occurs at the speed of light or slower. Therefore even though you pushed the pole now, it would take exactly one light year or less for the other person at the other end to see the corresponding push. (If they would see the motion in exactly one year I did not confirm, but I did confirm they would NOT see it transmitted faster than light).

Revisiting this for a moment, I came to this question: What if we take a single atom, albeit having an extremely small diameter, and played the same game of push/pull Morse Code? if we have a detector/observer on each side of an atom, and we push the atom, will the other observer on the opposite side see movement faster then the time it took light to travel from one side of the atom to the other (after all, they won't see the other observer make his 'push' until the light makes it over to the other side, but shouldn't the atom move on his end instantly?) Does the same argument which makes the answer for the question about the pole NO apply here? If so, is it because the smaller elements of the atom are being pushed up against each other at no faster than the speed of light? Furthermore, if that is the case, would that imply that there always needs to be something 'smaller' that an element is comprised of to prevent this FTL communication?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Realize that at the atomic level you do not have material packed up and the concept of a "push" is not very relevant. Instead, interatomic forces are carried by fields (such as the electromagnetic field) and changes in the fields are also limited to propagate at light speed or slower.

I would also like to point out that in your example of the pole, the signal would travel significantly slower than light speed - it would travel at the speed of sound in the pole material.
 
I see, so if we consider the atom in terms of movement derived from a force being applied to it, it cannot be imagined as something like a baseball moving back and forth, but propagation of information throughout the field which still occurs at sub-luminal speeds. While indeed frustrating when trying to 'visualize' the situation, it surely makes sense that changes in the field are limited to the speed of light/information. I'm sure any experienced physicist went through the breaking of bad habits such as thinking of atomic structures as 'material' :) Thank you for the answer.
 
aademarco said:
I'm sure any experienced physicist went through the breaking of bad habits such as thinking of atomic structures as 'material' :)

We have all been through some phases before learning more. Back in compulsory school I hypothesized that electrons were like miniature planets orbiting a nucleus central "star" - which was quite natural based on my knowledge at that stage but utterly wrong... I think it is healthy to make such questions as long as you are willing to accept that a preconceived notion regarding the answer may be wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K