Fuel Measurement: How PWR Nuclear Plants Calculate Fuel Amount

  • Thread starter Thread starter EEstudentNAU
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fuel Measurement
AI Thread Summary
PWR nuclear plants determine remaining fuel through core simulation codes that predict cycle length, reactivity, and enrichment depletion based on decades of operational experience. Daily monitoring of boric acid content, core power distribution, and exit temperatures provides accurate assessments of core conditions. While some plants may run with low soluble boron until reactivity approaches zero, surplus reactivity often remains due to operational variations. Core simulation codes are validated against experimental data, including gamma scanning and post-irradiation examinations of fuel rods. This comprehensive approach ensures effective management of nuclear fuel and operational safety.
EEstudentNAU
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
How do (PWR) nuclear plants determine how much fuel is left? Do they measure it? I heard they calculate it, but i was wondering if any measurement is done? Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What does one mean by fuel left? Does one mean how much reactivity or enrichment is left?
 
Astronuc said:
What does one mean by fuel left? Does one mean how much reactivity or enrichment is left?


yeah
 
The vendors and utilities have core simulation codes that do a very good job of predicting cycle length, reactivity and local power distribution, enrichment depletion, in conjunction with the operation of the plant. There's now about 40+ years of experience.

In PWRs, the plants design the boric acid content in the water, and that is monitored daily. The core power distribution and core exit temperatures are monitored so the operators are aware of the core power level and radial power distribution. It's fairly accurate to the last EFPD (effective full power day).

Some plants design for coastdown (gradual power reduction) and feedwater temperature reduction, and they can run out to essentially no soluble boron in the primary coolant, and the reactivity essentially goes to zero or slightly negative, and then the plant is shutdown with control rods.

However, many times, some surplus reactivity remains, i.e. the fuel is not full depleted because the unit may have had a mid-cycle outage, a trip, or a period of reduced power operation, and the cycle simply runs out to the scheduled end of cycle refueling outage.

The core simulation codes have been benchmarked against experimental data, including gamma scanning of fuel rods, as well as hot cell PIE (post-irradiation examination) in which various fission products and transuranic isotopes are measured.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top