Full Wave Rectifier - Capacitor Filter and Output Ripple

In summary: What is the difference between rms and average voltage?The average voltage is just the average of all the voltage measurements taken over a given period of time. RMS is the voltage measured at one specific point in time.In summary, the homework equation states that the output voltage will be 12.12 V when the turns ratio is 14.
  • #1
izelkay
115
3

Homework Statement


MjhXiti.png

I'm having trouble understanding part C of this question.

Homework Equations


ΔVo = Vout/2fRC

The Attempt at a Solution


So to get ~12V at the output, the turns ratio should be 14 because 120√2/12 = 14.14.

Using a turns ratio of 14, the output voltage will be 12.12 V.

To find the the value of the resistance, I can use P = V2rms / R, where P = 24 W and Vrms = 12.12/√2.

So R = 3 Ω.

But then how do I find ΔVo so I can find the capacitance?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
izelkay said:

The Attempt at a Solution


So to get ~12V at the output, the turns ratio should be 14 because 120√2/12 = 14.14.
Using a turns ratio of 14, the output voltage will be 12.12 V.
OK
To find the the value of the resistance, I can use P = V2rms / R, where P = 24 W and Vrms = 12.12/√2.
So R = 3 Ω.
Not OK. The output voltage is 12VDC, the power is 24W, what is R? Not 3Ω.
But then how do I find ΔVo so I can find the capacitance?
You are allowed a 3% droop from the 12VDC every time the ac input drops off its + or - peak.
 
  • #3
rude man said:
You are allowed a 3% droop from the 12VDC every time the ac input drops off its + or - peak.
Oh okay so then with my turns ratio, ΔVo = 12.12*0.03 = 0.3636 V
rude man said:
The output voltage is 12VDC, the power is 24W, what is R? Not 3Ω.
Hm I'm a bit confused, how else would I calculate the power absorbed by the resistor here? Everything else we've done so far has it as either P = V2rms/R or P = I2rmsR. Or because it's DC, should it just be 12.122/R without converting to rms?
 
  • #4
izelkay said:
Oh okay so then with my turns ratio, ΔVo = 12.12*0.03 = 0.3636 V
right
Or because it's DC, should it just be 12.122/R without converting to rms?
Yes, and you'd better understand why fully. If you had a 12V car battery running a load dissipating 24W, what would the load resistance have to be?
 
  • #5
rude man said:
right

Yes, and you'd better understand why fully. If you had a 12V car battery running a load dissipating 24W, what would the load resistance have to be?
Using the equation it'd be 6 Ω.

But is it different for half-wave rectifiers then? I'm looking at this example in my book and it's using RMS to calculate the power (part b):
4FhsKtF.png

But the output of a HWR is DC too isn't it?
 
  • #6
izelkay said:
Using the equation it'd be 6 Ω.
right.
But is it different for half-wave rectifiers then? I'm looking at this example in my book and it's using RMS to calculate the power (part b):
But the output of a HWR is DC too isn't it?
The hwr is a half-sine wave WITHOUT A CAPACITIVE FILTER. Your full-wave rectifier circuit INCLUDES a CAPACITIVE FILTER. The latter is practically like the output of a car battery; the former is a half-sine wave. If your fwr circuit didn't include the capacitor, the rms voltage would be double the half-wave unfiltered output.

You badly need to understand what rms means fundamentally.
In the case of the car battery, 12V is the rms voltage.
What is rms voltage? It's the voltage, when squared and divided by resistance, gives power.
For a 115V home voltage source the rms is 115V. For a 12V car battery it's 12V.
In general, the rms voltage is √∫V2(t)dt/T over any integer number of periods T. In the case of a DC voltage there is no period so you can integrate over any time interval T you like. A trivial case.
The idea is you get the same amount of power dissipation for any periodic or DC voltage if you use the rms value of that voltage.
 
  • #7
rude man said:
The hwr is a half-sine wave WITHOUT A CAPACITIVE FILTER. Your full-wave rectifier circuit INCLUDES a CAPACITIVE FILTER. The latter is practically like the output of a car battery; the former is a half-sine wave. If your fwr circuit didn't include the capacitor, the rms voltage would be double the half-wave unfiltered output.
Right, I understand that.
rude man said:
You badly need to understand what rms means fundamentally.
In the case of the car battery, 12V is the rms voltage.
What is rms voltage? It's the voltage, when squared and divided by resistance, gives power.
Okay
rude man said:
For a 115V home voltage source the rms is 115V. For a 12V car battery it's 12V.
In general, the rms voltage is √∫V2(t)dt/T over any integer number of periods T. In the case of a DC voltage there is no period so you can integrate over any time interval T you like. A trivial case.
The idea is you get the same amount of power dissipation for any periodic or DC voltage if you use the rms value of that voltage.

I'm sorry but I'm still having trouble understanding. I know what rms means but it's confusing me in this instance.

In a full-wave rectifier without cap filter, the output voltage would be the fully rectified input sinusoid, and the rms would be double the hwr, like you said.
How does that change with a capacitor? It's not a fully rectified sinusoid anymore, but the fwr is still periodic with the period being from when one diode pair is on to when both diode pairs are off (and the capacitor starts discharging), right? Why wouldn't I take the rms of this for power calculations? You mentioned above that 12V IS the rms voltage, but how/why? Do I just assume it's rms when they tell me what the output voltage should be like in this question?
 
  • #8
izelkay said:
How does that change with a capacitor? It's not a fully rectified sinusoid anymore, but the fwr is still periodic with the period being from when one diode pair is on to when both diode pairs are off (and the capacitor starts discharging), right? Why wouldn't I take the rms of this for power calculations? You mentioned above that 12V IS the rms voltage, but how/why? Do I just assume it's rms when they tell me what the output voltage should be like in this question?
OK, good question. And in fact you're right. The output of your filtered (capacitor added to satisfy the 3% error criterion) is not a pure 12VDC voltage. It's a periodic voltage with sudden jumps of 0.36V (when the diodes conduct) and exponential decays back down 0.36V until the next diode conduction. So it's a voltage with just under 12V average with peak-to-peak "ripple" of 0.36V. If you perform my rms formula you will get close to 12V as the rms voltage - you should try it. Notice that the capacitor size matters a lot, which is why the problem asks you to come up with a value big enough to meet the 3% droop requirement. As you lower the capacitance from this value you will get more and more decay before the next diode conduction event, until when C=0 there is just the fwr rectified sine-wave.
 
  • #9
rude man said:
OK, good question. And in fact you're right. The output of your filtered (capacitor added to satisfy the 3% error criterion) is not a pure 12VDC voltage. It's a periodic voltage with sudden jumps of 0.36V (when the diodes conduct) and exponential decays back down 0.36V until the next diode conduction. So it's a voltage with just under 12V average with peak-to-peak "ripple" of 0.36V. If you perform my rms formula you will get close to 12V as the rms voltage - you should try it. Notice that the capacitor size matters a lot, which is why the problem asks you to come up with a value big enough to meet the 3% droop requirement. As you lower the capacitance from this value you will get more and more decay before the next diode conduction event, until when C=0 there is just the fwr rectified sine-wave.
Ohh okay I think I'm starting to get it now. Ideally, a FWR with cap filter would output a pure DC voltage. That's why (depending on the capacitor value) I can use the DC power formulas (P = IV, P = V²/R), even though there's a small voltage ripple. But with a FWR without a cap filter, I need to use AC power formulas (P = V²rms / R, P = I²rms*R) because the output is sinusoidal. Is that correct?
 
  • #10
izelkay said:
Ohh okay I think I'm starting to get it now. Ideally, a FWR with cap filter would output a pure DC voltage. That's why (depending on the capacitor value) I can use the DC power formulas (P = IV, P = V²/R), even though there's a small voltage ripple. But with a FWR without a cap filter, I need to use AC power formulas (P = V²rms / R, P = I²rms*R) because the output is sinusoidal. Is that correct?
Yes, but keep in mind what i said: rms voltage always gives power = Vrms2/R, no matter what the shape of the voltage waveform. In fact, that's the definition of rms voltage: to give the same power (averaged over 1 or more cycles) irrespective of the waveform shape.
The general formula for Vrms for any periodic waveform is the integral I stated previously. You should try to understand why that integral always gives the correct power averaged over 1 or more cycles.
 
  • Like
Likes izelkay
  • #11
Pardon my jumping in here, but has anyone considered that a practical design should take into account the voltage drops that occur on the diodes? There are two basic rectification arrangements, one using a bridge rectifier (two diode drops) and the other the classic full wave rectifier using a center-tapped transformer (one diode drop).
 
  • #12
gneill said:
Pardon my jumping in here, but has anyone considered that a practical design should take into account the voltage drops that occur on the diodes? There are two basic rectification arrangements, one using a bridge rectifier (two diode drops) and the other the classic full wave rectifier using a center-tapped transformer (one diode drop).
You could say that, and you could also point out that transformer resistances are not zero, core is nonlinear, etc. but for purposes of this exercise I think assuming ideal components is the way to go. It's a very introductory course obviously.
 
  • #13
rude man said:
You could say that, and you could also point out that transformer resistances are not zero, core is nonlinear, etc. but for purposes of this exercise I think assuming ideal components is the way to go. It's a very introductory course obviously.
That's fine, so long as the idealization is acknowledged in the submitted answer.
 
  • #14
gneill said:
That's fine, so long as the idealization is acknowledged in the submitted answer.
Yes, but a circuit was not described in the post so I'd assume the default is ideal diodes. Otherwise the answer would depend on the circuit configuration.
 
  • #15
Yeah we're assuming ideal components. The non-idealities come into play for the lab portion of this class.
 
  • #16
izelkay said:
But then how do I find ΔVo so I can find the capacitance?

The output must remain within +/-3% of 12V and that includes the ripple.

Q = CV
I = Cdv/dt
dv/dt = I/C

You know the allowed dv, estimate dt and you know I.

3% is actually quite a tight spec.
 

What is a full wave rectifier?

A full wave rectifier is an electronic circuit that converts alternating current (AC) to direct current (DC). It uses four diodes to allow current to flow in only one direction, resulting in a pulsating DC output.

How does a capacitor filter work in a full wave rectifier?

A capacitor filter is used in a full wave rectifier to smooth out the pulsating DC output. The capacitor stores charge during the peaks of the pulsating DC and releases it during the troughs, resulting in a more constant DC output.

What is ripple in the context of a full wave rectifier with capacitor filter?

Ripple refers to the small AC component that remains in the DC output of a full wave rectifier with capacitor filter. It is caused by the imperfect filtering of the capacitor and can be reduced by increasing the capacitance or using multiple stages of filtering.

What is the formula for calculating output ripple in a full wave rectifier with capacitor filter?

The formula for output ripple is Vr = (1/2fRC) * Vp, where Vr is the output ripple voltage, f is the frequency of the AC input, R is the load resistance, C is the capacitance, and Vp is the peak voltage of the AC input.

What are the advantages of using a full wave rectifier with capacitor filter?

The advantages of using a full wave rectifier with capacitor filter include higher efficiency, lower output ripple, and the ability to handle higher AC input voltages. It also produces a smoother DC output compared to a half wave rectifier.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
838
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
21K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top