Fully understanding a capacitor circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter mklein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor Circuit
AI Thread Summary
In a series circuit with a cell, capacitor, and resistor, the voltage across the resistor only appears when current flows, as it represents the energy potential needed to drive current through the resistor. When the capacitor is charging, it accumulates charge until its voltage matches that of the cell, resulting in no current and thus no voltage across the resistor. This phenomenon aligns with Ohm's law, where voltage (V) is directly related to current (I) and resistance (R); if current is zero, voltage is also zero. The distinction between EMF and voltage is highlighted, with the cell and capacitor creating an EMF while the resistor experiences a potential loss due to resistance. Understanding these principles clarifies the behavior of capacitors in circuits.
mklein
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Dear forum users

Firstly, I wanted to post in the General Physics area, but it wouldn't let me create a new thread there!

I am a secondary school science teacher, teaching physics up to A-level.

I was in the process of revising capacitors with the class and it occurred to me that I may have a bit of a gap in my understanding.

Consider a simple series circuit with a cell, capacitor and resistor. While charging, charge collects on the capacitor plates until the voltage over the capacitor equals the voltage of the cell. While a current flows there can be a voltage over the resistor too.

When fully charged, the voltage of the cell will equal that of the capacitor. But there will be no voltage over the resistor.

Of course I am happy with the result, but I am having trouble explaining exactly WHY there is only a voltage over the resistor while a current flows – and then there is no voltage over it when the current stops.

Does this have something to do with the difference in meaning between an EMF and a voltage? i.e. the cell and capacitor create an EMF (like a ‘push’ due to static charge on the plates) whereas with the resistor just experiences a loss of potential due to resistance?

Any explanation of this result would be really appreciated

Matt Klein
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the Forum!

The reason a voltage appears across the resistor has to do with forcing current flow. A voltage drop can be thought of as an energy potential difference needed to drive current through the resistor, which, aptly enough, resists the flow. Sometimes an analogy to water flowing in a pipe is helpful. A small pipe "resists" flow through friction with its walls. To produce a flow, you must drive the water through with a pressure differential across the pipe.

Here is a useful link:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe.html"

Click on "Ohms Law", "Resistance" and "Resistivity" on the index at right, and explore the further links on those pages.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Welcome Matt,

Don't forget Ohm's law:

V = I R

If I = 0 then V = 0, you cannot have one without the other.
 
The way I see it is I imagine the capacitor with just two plates for simplicity. When the capacitor is charged, the plates are at the same voltage. Thus, there is no difference in voltage between the plates and so the charges don't flow. No flow of charge means no current.
 
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top