Fundamental doubt on Acceleration.

AI Thread Summary
Acceleration occurs when a moving body changes its speed or direction, as velocity is a vector that includes both magnitude and direction. Even with constant speed, if the direction changes, such as in circular motion, the body experiences acceleration due to a perpendicular force acting on it. This acceleration can be calculated using centripetal force, confirming that both methods yield the same result. It's important to distinguish between speed and velocity, as constant speed in a circular path does not equate to constant velocity. Understanding these concepts clarifies the relationship between force, acceleration, and motion.
PhysicsBegner
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi Everyone, I have very fundamental question on Acceleration. I can understand that a moving body accelerates or de-accelerate when its velocity goes up and down.

But I couldn't understand; when we say a moving body accelrates or de-accelerates when the direction of moving body changes(with constant velocity). What acceleration literally means here?

I can understand mathematically since velocity is a vector we get acceleration whenever magnitude or direction changes. But I couldn't understand logically what acceleration means here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PhysicsBegner said:
Hi Everyone, I have very fundamental question on Acceleration. I can understand that a moving body accelerates or de-accelerate when its velocity goes up and down.

But I couldn't understand; when we say a moving body accelrates or de-accelerates when the direction of moving body changes(with constant velocity). What acceleration literally means here?

I can understand mathematically since velocity is a vector we get acceleration whenever magnitude or direction changes. But I couldn't understand logically what acceleration means here.

Whenever an object changes speed or direction then it feels a force and therefore acceleration, because velocity is a vector quantity. Acceleration in the case you have given, where it has constant speed, means that the force is perpendicular to the velocity of the body, which means it is moving in a circle.
 
I think u misunderstood only force causes acceleration, No force then no acceleration(Newton's first law). My doubt was: if we calculate acceleration of a body moving with a constant velocity in a circle using centripital force then wold it be equal to the acceleration calculated by direction change of velocity.
 
PhysicsBegner said:
My doubt was: if we calculate acceleration of a body moving with a constant velocity in a circle using centripital force then wold it be equal to the acceleration calculated by direction change of velocity.
Yes, of course. Those are just two ways of saying the same thing. (I assume you mean a body moving in a circle with constant speed, not constant velocity.)

You can calculate the acceleration of the object as kinematic exercise, getting ac = v^2/r. Applying Newton's 2nd law gives you Fc = mac. It's the same acceleration either way.
 
PhysicsBegner said:
I think u misunderstood only force causes acceleration, No force then no acceleration(Newton's first law). My doubt was: if we calculate acceleration of a body moving with a constant velocity in a circle
As Doc Al implies, this is impossible. To move with a constant velocity means to move at a constant speed in a straight line. "Velocity" is a vector quantity having both magnitude and direction. Change in either magnitude (speed) or direction is an acceleration.

using centripital force then wold it be equal to the acceleration calculated by direction change of velocity.
You are confusing "velocity" and "speed".
 
Yes, I meant constant speed not velocity. I was confused since some textbooks use term velocity instead of speed at certain places. And I understand that a body can't travel in circular path with constant velocity.

Thank you.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top