Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

Qube
Gold Member
Messages
461
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



The derivative of an integral with a constant as its lower bound and a function as its upper bound is the function at its upper bound multiplied by the derivative of the upper bound.

The Attempt at a Solution



How come the constant term has no bearing? I understand the derivative is un-doing the integral, but how come the constant term disappears?

Is this why?

https://scontent-b-mia.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/v/1459734_10201135696496253_598181064_n.jpg?oh=a9ce27391aab214e4545d0bddf547aa5&oe=5292F89D
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Having x as the variable of integration and in the range is a 'pun'. I.e. they're different variables really, so to make it clearer let's give them different names: ##\frac d{dx}\int_{t=1}^{x^2}t.dt##
Increasing x extends the integral at the right-hand end, but doesn't change the left-hand end. So the change in value of the integral does not depend on where the left-hand end is. Draw a picture.
 
haruspex said:
Having x as the variable of integration and in the range is a 'pun'. I.e. they're different variables really, so to make it clearer let's give them different names: ##\frac d{dx}\int_{t=1}^{x^2}t.dt##

Yes, it's the dummy variable of integration.
haruspex said:
Increasing x extends the integral at the right-hand end, but doesn't change the left-hand end. So the change in value of the integral does not depend on where the left-hand end is. Draw a picture.

I love geometric approaches to calculus. Indeed, what you say is true.
 
Qube said:

Homework Statement



The derivative of an integral with a constant as its lower bound and a function as its upper bound is the function at its upper bound multiplied by the derivative of the upper bound.

The Attempt at a Solution



How come the constant term has no bearing? I understand the derivative is un-doing the integral, but how come the constant term disappears?

Is this why?

https://scontent-b-mia.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/v/1459734_10201135696496253_598181064_n.jpg?oh=a9ce27391aab214e4545d0bddf547aa5&oe=5292F89D

Besides what others have told you, you can apply the general formula:
\frac{d}{dx} \int_{a(x)}^{b(x)} f(t) \, dt = f(t)|_{t=b(x)} \frac{db(x)}{dx} - f(t)|_{t=a(x)} \frac{d a(x)}{dx}
 
Qube said:

Homework Statement



The derivative of an integral with a constant as its lower bound and a function as its upper bound is the function at its upper bound multiplied by the derivative of the upper bound.

The Attempt at a Solution



How come the constant term has no bearing? I understand the derivative is un-doing the integral, but how come the constant term disappears?

Is this why?

https://scontent-b-mia.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/v/1459734_10201135696496253_598181064_n.jpg?oh=a9ce27391aab214e4545d0bddf547aa5&oe=5292F89D

Besides what others have told you, you can apply the general formula:
\frac{d}{dx} \int_{a(x)}^{b(x)} f(t) \, dt = f(t)|_{t=b(x)} \frac{db(x)}{dx} - f(t)|_{t=a(x)} \frac{d a(x)}{dx}
For a constant lower limit we have da/dx = 0.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top