FunGamesPhotos and Relationships forums

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The Fun, Games, Photos, and Relationships forums have been merged into the General Discussion forum to enhance thread discovery and streamline user experience. This consolidation aims to revive the vibrant community atmosphere that existed in the General Discussion area, which had diminished due to excessive categorization. Users expressed a desire for category options within General Discussion to maintain a sense of safety and clarity in conversations. The change is seen as a positive step towards re-establishing a lively and engaging community. Overall, the forum restructuring seeks to foster more interaction among members.
Messages
19,773
Reaction score
10,727
The Fun, Games, Photos and Relationships forums have been removed and all threads merged into the main General Discussion forum. This was done to consolidate and increase ease of thread discovery.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I found the Fun / Games / Photo areas a reassuringly safe refuge from anything too alarming or stressful, and it also made it easier to tell whether someone is joking or serious. Could we perhaps have category options for GD posts to serve a similar function?
 
  • Like
Likes Silicon Waffle
Greg Bernhardt said:
The Fun, Games, Photos and Relationships forums have been removed and all threads merged into the main General Discussion forum. This was done to consolidate and increase ease of thread discovery.
Good decision!

Back in the day, GD was the big, thriving 'social room' of PF, with people having all kinds of conversations all around you, playing games here, laughing there, or having heated discussions there. When everything got minutely categorized and shunted off to obscure back rooms, it had a chilling effect on the sense of community. All the sub-categories, and even GD proper, turned into ghost towns for several hours a day. Hopefully, things will now liven up again.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
42
Views
5K
Replies
44
Views
5K
Replies
66
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Back
Top