Funny looking equation for a paraboloid.

  • Thread starter Thread starter mishimakaz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Funny Paraboloid
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the volume between two paraboloids defined by the equations z = 4x^2 + 8y^2 and z = 30 - x^2 - y^2. The original poster attempts to switch to polar coordinates to simplify the integration process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of solving for r in polar coordinates and suggest focusing on the double integral of the upper and lower paraboloids over the common xy domain. There are varying opinions on whether to change variables or stick with Cartesian coordinates, with some suggesting that finding the bounds first could simplify the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering different strategies for determining the bounds of integration. Some suggest evaluating the paraboloids at specific points to find the upper paraboloid, while others propose that the boundary shape resembles an ellipse, which may require polar coordinates for proper integration.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on finding the correct bounds for integration, with participants noting that the boundary may not yield constant limits. The original poster's approach has led to complications, prompting suggestions to reconsider the method of integration.

mishimakaz
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the volume between 2 paraboloids.


Homework Equations



z = 4x^2+8y^2
z= 30-x^2-y^2

The Attempt at a Solution



So I switched the variables to polar coordinates.
z = 30-r^2
z=4r^2*sin^2(θ)+8r^2*cos^2(θ)

Now I want to solve for r. However I get a very ugly looking value for r that does not integrate very well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you want to solve that for r? You want to do a double integral of zupper - zlower over the common xy domain. Figure out the equation of that domain and it might suggest a change of variables to you.
 
I recommend two things:

1. No change of variables or coordinate systems, it just makes things more intricate.
2. Find the bounds first. They aren't as complex as you would imagine.

All of this assuming, you will use a double integral.

To find the upper paraboloid just evaluate the two at a point inside of the bounds you find.
 
To find the bounds, I would set z=0 and then solve for x and then y. For example...y = sqrt(24-x^2).
 
Last edited:
Instead of solving for y, if you keep the x's and y's on the same side, you should see a familiar function in there.
 

Attachments

  • Picture 10.png
    Picture 10.png
    22.9 KB · Views: 437
m.w.lever said:
Instead of solving for y, if you keep the x's and y's on the same side, you should see a familiar function in there.

equation of a circle of sorts?
 
yeah, I added an attachment, to my previous post, that shows the two paraboloids from the top. If you find the function for the boundary shape, you can find your bounds of x and y. Remember, you only need xmin xmax ymin and ymax
 
m.w.lever said:
yeah, I added an attachment, to my previous post, that shows the two paraboloids from the top. If you find the function for the boundary shape, you can find your bounds of x and y. Remember, you only need xmin xmax ymin and ymax

No. You will have an ellipse shaped boundary which does not give constant limits. And a substitution similar to, but not exactly the same as, polar coordinates will be very helpful. You need to set the two z values equal to get the equation of the ellipse.
 
LCKurtz is right, how could I be so silly, you can still get to the ellipse in cartesian, but for the bounds you will definitely need polar coordinates of some sort.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K