Fuse Rating Problem: Which is True?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phyphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fuse Rating
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the confusion around fuse ratings, stating that the rating indicates the maximum current a fuse can carry without melting, rather than the current at which it will immediately blow. Fast-blow fuses melt quickly upon reaching their rated current, while slow-blow fuses can tolerate brief current spikes but will eventually blow if the excess current persists. Specifications for fuses include curves that show the time it takes for a fuse to blow at different current levels, with a 3A fuse typically carrying up to 4A without blowing. The differences between fast and slow blow fuses lie in their response curves, not in the steady-state current they can handle. Ultimately, all fuses can withstand short transients without blowing, but fast-blow fuses react to these transients more quickly than slow-blow fuses.
phyphysics
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Some physics books said that the fuse rating is the maximum current that the fuse can carry without melting it. But some said that the fuse rating is indicating the current at which the fuse would immediately melt. Which is true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The latter, generally.

A fast-blow fuse will melt as soon as the rating is reached.
A slow-blow fuse may tolerate transient excesses of current, but will blow if this state is prolonged.
 
Fuses are rated according to the current which they will pass without melting. A full specification for a fuse will show curves giving the length of time a specific current will cause a typical fuse (of the given specification) to blow. As an example, see page four of:
http://www.bussmann.com/library/bifs/5022.PDF

Note that in the above diagram, the curve for the 3A rated fuse shows that it didn't blow below 4 amps. In other words, that fuse is supposed to carry 3 amps forever.

In actual use, I've seen fuses that apparently blew at their rated amperage, but that's not what the specs show. Maybe the circuit really takes more current than I thought. Maybe the fuse was defective. But the spec is clear. The fuse passes the rated current without blowing.

The difference between slow blow and fast blow fuses is in the shape of those curves, not the current that blows them in the steady state. In other words, if you draw a fast blow and slow blow curve on the same graph, the fast blow curve will be sharper, but they will intersect the long end of the time scale (i.e. the top of the graph on page 4 of the above link) at the same amperage (i.e. about 4 amps for a 3 amp fuse).

As far as transients go, all fuses will fail to blow if a transient of a given magnitude is sufficiently short in time. A fast blow fuse will blow on shorter transients than slow blow fuses. This is another way of saying that the "blow" side of their graph includes more territory in the above graph, but no fuse has a graph with a square corner (at the bottom left corner of the above graph).

Carl
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top