Fusion for Students: Cheapest Neutron & X-Ray Detectors, Vacuum Pumps, Deuterium

  • Thread starter Thread starter Urvabara
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fusion students
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the search for affordable neutron and X-ray detectors, as well as vacuum pumps suitable for student projects. Participants inquire about the cost of deuterium and its availability, expressing interest in alternatives like deuterium lumps for easier handling. There are suggestions to consider building a fusor, a type of inertial electrostatic confinement reactor, with potential institutional support for funding. Concerns are raised about the commercialization of IEC fusion and its impact on the broader scientific community. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the feasibility and educational value of pursuing fusion projects in a student context.
Urvabara
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
What is the cheapest possible neutron detector? Are there any cheap detectors (for students)?

What is the cheapest possible X-ray detector?

What is the cheapest possible vacuum pump? How noisy are they? I mean: Does the pumping noise disturb the wall neighbours?

Are there any other ways to tell that the nuclear FUSION reaction has happened except the neutron gain?

How much does deuterium cost? Is it the only possible fusionable matter in the market a student can buy?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I need a vacuum of 10^{-3} torrs.

PS. Where can I buy deuterium lump (Pycnodeuterium)? I think it would be more easier to handle than deuterium gas.
 
Out of curiosity may I ask you; why do you want to buy the stuff??
 
Nomy-the wanderer said:
Out of curiosity may I ask you; why do you want to buy the stuff??

Do you know Fusor? It's possible to build one, even high school kids have.
 
Maybe you should ask a member of staff at your institution to supervise a group intending to build a inertial electrostatic confinement (IEC) nuclear fusion reactor, otherwise known as a "fusor". You might get a little funding.

I had a look at fusor.net and don't really like the cut of their jib - it sounds like their trying to sell IEC fusion as the true product (a bit like those bogus adverts on the telly for rubbish kitchen appliances with not one, two, but three free gifts; plus a set of steak knives ;-) ). And also they seem to be trying to undermine the efforts of the funded science community who are endeavouring to supply nuclear fusion as civilian power source, as if they have a chip on their shoulder about magnetic confinement being chosen over IEC designs.

A fusor project would be worthwhile, I think. You'd learn a lot and have a lot of fun putting it together. Good luck!
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Back
Top