Fusion of Stars: Time Difference for 0.50 & 1.5 Msolar Stars

  • Thread starter Thread starter blumfeld0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fusion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the time difference in hydrogen fusion between 0.50 Msolar and 1.5 Msolar stars. The key equation involves comparing the mass converted to energy and the luminosity of the stars. This comparison can be derived using known values for our own sun as a reference. The user is seeking a straightforward equation to solve the problem. Understanding these relationships is crucial for determining the fusion duration of different mass stars.
blumfeld0
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
How many times longer does a 0.50 Msolar star fuse hydrogen at it’s core than dose a 1.5 Msolar star?

i just need the equation and i can figure it out. i can't find anything on google

thank you
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I take it that you're on some sort of astronomy course and this is homework? The equation you are looking for can be easily derived by cosidering the fractions of mass that a star converts to energy and the luminocity of the star then comparing that with the values for our own star.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top