Fusion Questions: How Does Fusing Nuclei Produce Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ParticalMan28
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fusion
ParticalMan28
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, Name's Mike.

I have a few questions regarding the fusion of atomic nuclei:

One of the basic laws of matter is that if you loose mass you release energy, and if you absorb energy efficiently, you'll gain mass respectively.


I understaind that during fission, when heavy atomic nuclei are split and energy is released from the force that once held the nuclei together ( I think that's the weak force...right? or was that the strong force?) is now force apart. So there was a lose in mass for heavy nuclei and neutron, and there was a gain in energy from fission fragments, electrons, and nuetrinos.

but..in fussion such as the one in the sun fuses lighter nuclei to form heavier nuclei. but that you're creating a more massive object, but you still release more energy from the reaction (even more from the fission reaction).

So, I now I'm missing out on something in the prosses, so how can this be?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In fusion deuteron+triton-->He+n.
Since d+t is more massive than He+n, energy is released.

In fission, the force holding the nucleus together is the "strong" force, but the energy release arises mostly from the difference in the Coulomb energies of the nuclei.
 
Take a look at (aka google) "Binding energy per nucleon."

Basically, for the lighter nuclei, the binding energy per nucleon increases with mass (up to Iron). This makes fusion a reaction that releases energy for nuclei lighter than Iron. For heavier nuclei you do not.

After about Iron on the "binding energy per nucleon" vs mass number graphs, you see that the slope become negative. This means that fission is a process that will release energy.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top