Fusion with Nutcracker: Is it Possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bengey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    fusion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the feasibility of using a mechanical device, likened to a nutcracker, to fuse deuterium and tritium atoms without the extreme temperatures and pressures typically required for fusion. While the idea of mechanically trapping and squeezing atoms is intriguing, it faces significant challenges, particularly in generating the necessary pressure and density for fusion to occur. Existing methods, such as laser fusion and diamond anvils, highlight the difficulty of achieving the required conditions, as even high-pressure techniques often fall short. The energy needed for fusion is estimated to be around 0.1 MeV, but the mechanical forces involved are vastly weaker than those needed to overcome atomic bonds. Ultimately, the analogy of trying to fuse atoms with a mechanical device is compared to attempting to slam cannonballs together with cotton candy, emphasizing the impracticality of the approach.
Bengey
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Would it be possible to mechanically trap deuterium and tritum atoms and squeeze them together in a nutcracker type device to fuse them? I believe we have technology to manipulate individual atoms, or at least small quantities, and it should be possible to get them into a vise. This would avoid the high energies and temperatures of other approaches.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Well what you are looking for here is device capable of generating such a high pressure and density that the atoms spontaneously fuse.
Such systems are not only possible, they actually exist, but they are hardly 'low energy'.
They are called stars.
 
  • Like
Likes bharathraman
rootone said:
Well what you are looking for here is device capable of generating such a high pressure and density that the atoms spontaneously fuse.
Such systems are not only possible, they actually exist, but they are hardly 'low energy'.
They are called stars.
No, I'm looking for a device to mechanically overcome the Coulomb force for just a few atoms at a time, avoiding high temp and pressure. I believe the energy needed is on the order of .1MeV
 
The problem is confining the force needed to a small area. Laser fusion program is vaguely similar to what you want.
 
  • Like
Likes bharathraman
What I'm asking is whether some kind of mechanical confinement can achieve the goal. We've made great advances in nanotechnology, why not nano-nutcrackers to squeeze atoms together? As for laser fusion, wouldn't that also be easier to achieve with micro or nano-sized fuel pellets?
 
Bengey said:
What I'm asking is whether some kind of mechanical confinement can achieve the goal. We've made great advances in nanotechnology, why not nano-nutcrackers to squeeze atoms together? As for laser fusion, wouldn't that also be easier to achieve with micro or nano-sized fuel pellets?

There are diamond anvils that create great pressures. But not nearly enough for fusion. It seems to me that almost any material would shatter before it would cause hydrogen to fuse.

Right now they are trying to produce liquid metallic hydrogen with diamond anvils, but the diamonds shatter. It seems to me that the hydrogen is going to diffuse into any conceivable material before it will fuse with itself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Would the first problem go away if you're dealing with very small amounts? If I'm right about needing only on the order of .1MeV, that doesn't seem diamond-shattering. On the other hand the diffusion issue seems more serious. Or would a speedy operation get around that?
 
Bengey said:
What I'm asking is whether some kind of mechanical confinement can achieve the goal. We've made great advances in nanotechnology, why not nano-nutcrackers to squeeze atoms together? As for laser fusion, wouldn't that also be easier to achieve with micro or nano-sized fuel pellets?
Pellets are small. ~.1 mm diameter in at least one program.
 
Which program, and do you know if that's giving them better results?
 
  • #10
Bengey said:
Which program, and do you know if that's giving them better results?
The only specific size I found was for an older program (Shiva). Google "laser fusion pellet" gives lots of hits, but it is hard to find numbers for the size.
 
  • #11
Bengey said:
No, I'm looking for a device to mechanically overcome the Coulomb force for just a few atoms at a time, avoiding high temp and pressure. I believe the energy needed is on the order of .1MeV
Yes that's the ballpark, fusion occurs as low as ~0.01 MeV for the ions of deuterium and tritium fuel. One way to look at the problem with using a mechanical "nutcracker" is that the chemical bonds holding together solid lattices are on order of a couple eV, tens of thousands times less: a bit like trying slam two cannon balls together with cotton candy. That's of course as one would expect, else fusion would be ongoing all the time inside the Earth where pressures are extreme, but far short of that which can be found inside of a star.
 
  • Like
Likes e.bar.goum
  • #12
mheslep said:
a bit like trying slam two cannon balls together with cotton candy

I'm going to have to remember that analogy, it's just a bit brilliant.
 

Similar threads

Fusion catalized from graphite?
Replies
16
Views
3K
Nuclear fusion energy calculations
Replies
16
Views
5K
Inertial confinement fusion (First light, NIF, etc)
Replies
2
Views
2K
Pulsed Tokamak Fusion: Net Energy Gain Possibility?
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Understanding Nuclear Fusion Cross Section Diagrams
Replies
2
Views
3K
Danger and risks of fusion power
Replies
7
Views
2K
Hot core and preheating for fusion
Replies
18
Views
8K
Nuclear fusion using miniature optical particle accelerator?
Replies
6
Views
2K
B Could Fusion Reactions Occur Randomly in the Atmosphere or Planetary Cores?
Replies
19
Views
2K
Fusion Plasma Trap: Capturing Neutral & Quasi-Neutral Plasmas
Replies
8
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top