|G|=p^k. Prove G has an element of order p.

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmajor2013
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Element
mathmajor2013
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Let p be a prime, k a pos. int., and G a group with |G|=p^k. Prove that G has an element of order p.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider x^{\frac{m}{p}} for some element x not equal to the identity, where m is the order of x.
 
This kind of seems like a contradiction because m/p is smaller than m, yet x^m/p=(x^m)^1/p=e^1/p=e.
 
mathmajor2013 said:
This kind of seems like a contradiction because m/p is smaller than m, yet x^m/p=(x^m)^1/p=e^1/p=e.

What does (x^m)^(1/p) mean?
 
The pth root of x^m? I'm sorry I cannot see where this one is going
 
mathmajor2013 said:
The pth root of x^m? I'm sorry I cannot see where this one is going

You have written it yourself, but it doesn't make any sense. x^{\frac{m}{p}} makes perfect sense, since m divides p^k.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top