Galilean transform and Lorentz transform questions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the application of the Galilean and Lorentz transforms in relation to moving and stationary observers. It confirms that the Galilean transform can determine Alice's position from Bob's perspective and vice versa, but does not apply when considering Bob as the moving observer with Alice stationary. Similarly, the Lorentz transform operates under the same principles, allowing for the conversion of coordinates between different rest frames. The conversation emphasizes that both transforms facilitate understanding the relationship between observers in motion. Additionally, there is a request for resources to practice problems related to Galilean transforms.
rgtr
Messages
90
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
I am just curious about the Galilean transform and the Lorentz Transform
Relevant Equations
## x = x'+vt ##
## x = gamma(x'+vt') ##
I have a quick question about the Galilean transform. If I have Alice running and Bob stationary. The Galilean transform will tell me the position of Alice from Bob's stationary position. Also if I have Alice's position which is moving it will tell me Bob's stationary position.

If I want Bob moving and Alice stationary that is not what the Galilean transform does. Is this correct?

I have not gotten to it yet but previously have read a little bit about the Lorentz transform for position the same logic applies as above.

If I want Bob moving and Alice stationary that is not what the Lorentz transform does. Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
rgtr said:
The Galilean transform will tell me the position of Alice from Bob's stationary position. Also if I have Alice's position which is moving it will tell me Bob's stationary position.
No, it will not. It will tell you how the coordinates of an event in Alice and Bob’s rest frames relate to each other.
rgtr said:
Homework Statement:: I am just curious about the Galilean transform and the Lorentz Transform
Relevant Equations:: ## x = x'+vt ##
## x = gamma(x'+vt') ##

If I want Bob moving and Alice stationary that is not what the Lorentz transform does. Is this correct?
No. Both going back and forth between their rest frames are Galilean/Lorentz transformations (which depending on whether you do classical mechanics or special relativity).
 
Thanks for that clarification. Any idea where I could practice a few questions about Galilean transforms?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top