Galileo's Experiment with an Inclined Plane

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Galileo's experiment with inclined planes, specifically focusing on the interpretation of experimental results to determine the relationship between distance and time squared (d(t) proportional to t²). The scope includes experimental methodology and data analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Experimental/applied
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents experimental data from an inclined plane and seeks to interpret the results to support the claim that distance is proportional to the square of time.
  • Another participant suggests measuring 'dt' and recommends fitting a curve to the data, either through a quadratic fit or visually.
  • A different participant proposes that a hand-drawn curve could suffice for analysis, emphasizing the use of tangents to find speed rather than a formal quadratic fit.
  • Another suggestion is made to plot distance against time squared to assess how well the data points align with a straight line, relating the slope to acceleration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various methods for analyzing the data, with no consensus on the best approach to interpret the results or the necessity of a quadratic fit versus a simpler method.

Contextual Notes

Participants do not clarify the assumptions behind their methods or the specific definitions of terms like 'dt' and 'slope', leaving some aspects of the discussion unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring experimental physics, data analysis techniques, or historical experiments in motion.

Lukeblackhill
Messages
39
Reaction score
3
Morning mates,

I've peformed Galileo's experiment with inclined planes, using a ramp of 88cm (divided in 4 parts of 22cm), inclined by a height on the right-edge of 4cm. I've measured the following,

1/4 of the ramp (22cm): 1.75s (error of 0.1s)
1/2 of the ramp (44cm): 2.70s (error of 0.1s)
3/4 of the ramp (66cm): 3.25s (error of 01.s)
4/4 of the ramp (88c): 3.80s (error of 01.s)

How can I interpret such results in order to arrive to the conclusion that d(t) is proportional to t²?

Thanks!
Cheers,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To measure ‘dt’ you need a step that’s something like a real d or delta. But you could try to fit a curve to your data (best quadratic fit or by eye)
 
anorlunda said:
Do you know how to fit a curve as @sophiecentaur suggested?
You don't need to do a quadratic fit if those data points fit well to a hand drawn curve and you can draw a tangent at the various points to find the slope (which is the speed, Δd/Δt) Not as 'good' but it would give a set of speeds which should increase in equal steps for equal time increases. (Quick and dirty method with very little brain ache)
 
You can plot d versus t2 and see how well the points fit a straight line.
Compare the slope of the line with a/2 where a is the acceleration for the motion on the incline.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters and sophiecentaur

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
14K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
50
Views
14K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
7K