Game Strategy (pick the lowest unrepeated number)

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaleidoscope
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Game Strategy
kaleidoscope
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
This is a game with N players where each player secretly picks a number from 0 to 100. The winner is the player who picks the lowest unrepeated number. Which number would you pick? What would be your strategy?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's probably not the smartest number to choose, but I'd choose 0. Only because if I assume that every other player has the mentality that at least two people will choose 0, nobody would choose 0. However, if someone else thinks the same way I do, then I'll probably lose.
 
I'm thinking that more than one will have the strategy of post #2. So I'd choose 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001
 
In the non-cooperative scenario, this game has no pure Nash equilibrium. The mixed one is attained when all players pick one of the N numbers randomly, using a uniform distribution.
 
the guy who answers this1 needs to be a psychologist not a mathwiz
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top