Gamma Distribution (Statistics)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a gamma distribution problem involving a random variable X with parameters a=3 and b=2. Participants are attempting to determine the probability that 1 ≤ X ≤ 2 using the gamma distribution formula.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the gamma distribution formula and the integration process to find the probability. There are questions about the correctness of the formula used and the evaluation of the integral. Some participants express confusion over differing answers from the textbook and the implications of parameterization.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their calculations and questioning the validity of their approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the integration and parameterization, but no consensus has been reached on the correct method or answer.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of differing definitions of parameters between sources, which may contribute to confusion. Participants are also grappling with the implications of their calculations yielding probabilities that seem unreasonable.

kuahji
Messages
390
Reaction score
2
A random variable X is gamma distributed with a=3, b=2 (alpha/beta). Determine the probability that 1\leqX\leq2

The first thing I did was plug a & b into the gamma distribution formula 1/(b^a \Gammaa * x^(a-1) * e^(-x/b)

Which I ended up with

1/16(x^2 * e^(-x/2)

Which I then though I'd take the integral from 1 to 2

\int 1/16(x^2 * e^(-x/2) dx = 1/16(-2x^2 * e^-.5 - 8x * e^-.5 - 16e^-.5) & then I evaluated that from 1 to 2. Which gave .06...

The answer in the book gives (b-a)^4/80

So where am I going wrong & am I just approaching this problem in totally the wrong way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try this for Gamma density.

f(x)= \frac {\beta^\alpha}{\Gamma(\alpha)}x^{\alpha -1} e^{-\beta x}

The books answer would be negative ?
 
Last edited:
The book answer wouldn't be negative, it'd be ((2-3)^4)/80.
 
Also tried the formula, it does not work, it gives a probability over 11, which clearly can't be. The only difference between the formula I posted & yours is you have e^-bx & I had e^(-x/b).
 
I am assuming montoyas7940 looked up the gamma pdf on wikipedia (as I did) and I think that parametrization is correct for your application.

I get:

\int_{1}^{2} 4x^{2}e^{-2x}dx

That doesn't evaluate to 1/80.

Try this maybe: P(1<X<2) = P(X<2)+P(X<1)-1
 
Oh, I see. I assumed an extra set of parentheses in the books answer. I used the gamma density from "Probability for Risk Management".
 
Unless I fat fingered a key on my calculator,

\int_{1}^{2} 4x^{2}e^{-2x}dx

is not .6 either.
 
I read the answer book wrong... sorry. :) Its NOT (b-a)^4/80.

The answer was approx. .0659.

Someone asked about the fact Probability for Risk Management gave a different answer today, but I'm not sure what they eventually decided. Using the formula you give I'm still getting 11.14, but I do recall the professor saying Probability for Risk Managements define their alpha as our beta... what I mean is its flip-flopped from what our notation is in the text we use. Anyway, thanks for your time & the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K