Is My Solution for 4sinx - 3cosx Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Caldus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosine Sine
AI Thread Summary
The solution for the expression 4sinx - 3cosx is proposed as 5sin(x + sin^-1(-3/5). The method used involves converting the linear combination of sine and cosine into a single sine function using the formula for amplitude and phase shift. The angle is calculated as sin^-1(b / (a^2 + b^2)^1/2), and the reverse process using the angle addition identity confirms the correctness of the solution. The final verification shows that the answer checks out with the original equation, indicating a complete solution.
Caldus
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
I'm unsure as to whether I'm correct with this:

4sinx - 3cosx

My answer ended up being 5sin(x + sin^-1 (-3/5)).

The equations I used were:

asinx + bcosx = (a^2 + b^2)^1/2 * sin(x + angle)
angle = sin^-1 (b / (a^2 + b^2)^1/2))

Can someone clarify whether I'm correct? I would appreciate it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A good way to check your answer is to reverse the process using the angle addition identity:

sin (θ + φ) = sin θ cos φ + cos θ sin φ

And using the facts

sin arcsin (3/5) = 3/5
and
cos arcsin (3/5) = 4/5. (why?)
 
I checked my answer and it equals the original equation, but have I fully solved it?
 
If it checks (and I agree that it does), then yep!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top