Gas Chromatagraph: Continuous or Plused Operation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter flatmaster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the history of space exploration, specifically the Pioneer Venus 2 mission, which involved sending probes into Venus's atmosphere to collect data before their destruction upon impact. A key focus is on the gas chromatograph (GC) used in these probes, which analyzes gas samples based on their travel time through a column. The conversation explores the feasibility of creating a continuously running or pulsed GC, acknowledging that while a shorter column could be used, it would compromise resolution. The possibility of operating multiple columns in pulsed mode is also mentioned. Additionally, a reference is made to a recent lecture on a two-dimensional gas chromatography setup (GCxGC) that successfully utilized a pulsed column, affirming that such advancements in GC technology are indeed achievable.
flatmaster
Messages
497
Reaction score
2
I'm intreaged by our history of space exploration. On Pioner Venus2, four sacrificial probes were sent through the Venusian atmosphere while they quickly streamed back their data to the orbitor. They were destroyed when impacting the surface. One of the devices on the probes was a gas chromatagraph. The gas chromatagraph I know of can only take a given sample of gas, and determines the identity of the gas by the amount of time it takes for that gas to travel through the column.

My question is can you make a continusly running or plused GC? I assume you could make a really short column, but this would reduce your resolution on the time-in-column measurement.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I recently attended a lecture by my schools chemistry department where they built a two-dimensional (GCxGC) chromatagraph using two columns, one being pulsed. So yes you can do it.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top