Gas Leak (Effusion): Solving Differential Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter moonman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Effusion Gas
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a differential equation related to gas leaking from a container through a pinhole, represented as dN/dt = (Constants)*N. The solution yields an exponential function, but there is confusion regarding the dimensional consistency of the exponent, particularly whether it should involve time. It is clarified that for the equation to be valid, the exponent must be dimensionless, and the constant C should have units of 1/sec. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precise formulas, suggesting a more accurate representation of the gas leak dynamics. Overall, the focus is on ensuring dimensional consistency in the mathematical model of gas effusion.
moonman
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a question where gas is leaking out of a container from a small pinhole. I have a differential equation dN/dt = (Constants)*N. I solved this to get an exponential. The exponent is that group of constants, which are A/2V*(kT/m)^1/2. Shouldn't the exponent have something to do with time? Because if they don't, the dimensions don't work out. Can anyone clear this up for me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dN/dt = C * N
yields
N = N0 * exp (C * t)
,where t is time

BTW, this is not "Advanced Physics" ;-)
 
You're right, that's not advanced physics, its simple DE. But that's not what I asked.
For that equation to make sense, the exponent should be dimensionless. C*t is not. That's the part I don't understand
 
N is a count ... dN/dt has units counts/sec ... C must have units 1/sec.
 
If A is area and V is volume (and yes, they are) then dimension of your constant is
m2/m3 * m/s = 1/s
and no problem.
I advise to use more precise formula
dN/dt = -1/4 n*<v>*A = -1/4 AN/V * sqrt[kT/(2*3.1416*m)]
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top