Gas pressure and container shape.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between gas pressure and the shape of containers filled with an ideal gas, specifically examining whether different shapes with the same volume affect the pressure experienced by the gas. The conversation explores theoretical implications of the ideal gas law, molecular impacts, and surface area considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that according to the ideal gas law, pressure should be the same in two containers of the same volume, temperature, and moles of gas, regardless of shape.
  • Another participant suggests that integrating the absolute force over the walls of the container would yield different results due to the varying surface areas, implying that more surface area leads to more molecular collisions.
  • A different participant agrees that the number of molecular impacts on the cube's surface will be greater but argues that when normalized by surface area, the impacts per unit area will be identical, leading to equal pressure.
  • Some participants express difficulty in visualizing the reasoning behind the greater number of impacts on the cube's surface compared to the sphere's surface.
  • One participant proposes a mathematical definition of pressure as a product of impact frequency and mean impulse, reinforcing that while the cube experiences more total impacts, the pressure remains the same due to equal impacts per unit area.
  • A participant acknowledges confusion regarding the mathematical calculation of pressure in terms of molecular impacts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the pressure should be the same in both containers when considering the ideal gas law, but there is ongoing debate about the implications of surface area and molecular impacts, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully resolved the implications of surface area on molecular impacts and pressure calculations, and there are assumptions about the ideal gas behavior that may not be universally accepted.

Dragynfyre
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I've been thinking about the ideal gas law lately and there is something I don't understand. Say you have 2 containers filled with an ideal gas. Both containers contain the same moles of gas, the same temperature of gas, and both containers have the same volume. Therefore, according to the ideal gas law the pressure in both containers will be same regardless of the container shape since P = RnT/V and all the variables on the right side are the same for both containers. However, I have thought of a situation where this doesn't seem possible.

Here's an example. One container is a sphere and one container is in the shape of a cube. Now let's say both containers have the same volume of 1m3.

According to the volume formula for a cube the dimensions of the cube will be:
1m*1m*1m

Therefore surface area of a cube is
6m2

According to the volume formula of a sphere the radius of the sphere will be roughly 0.62m and will have a surface area of 4.83m2As you can see the cube has a larger surface area compared to the sphere even though they both have the same volume. Now since Pressure=Force/Area wouldn't the pressure in the sphere be higher than the pressure in the cube? I would expect if the number of gas molecules in the container are the same and temperature is also the same then the force applied on the container would be the same.

So basically my question is what am I missing here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you integrated the absolute force over the walls of the container, the answer would not be the same between the two containers. (If you integrated the force as a vector, the total force in both cases would be 0 since the gas can't propel the container in one direction preferentially when the average velocity of the gas molecules was 0.)

Even though the number of molecules is the same in both cases, the one with more surface area will get more collisions in a given interval of time. If there is more area for the molecules to hit, they will hit more often.
 
The number of molecular impacts upon the surface of the cube in one second will indeed be greater than the number of molecular impacts upon the surface of the sphere. However the surface area of the cube is greater than the surface area of the sphere. Divide the number of impacts by the surface area and you get identical numbers of impacts per unit area per second. Ergo, the pressure is the same on both surfaces.
 
Last edited:
Hmm I'm having trouble visualizing why more molecules will hit the surface of the cube.
 
Dragynfyre said:
Hmm I'm having trouble visualizing why more molecules will hit the surface of the cube.

Because there is greater surface area: 6.00 square meters versus 4.83 square meters. However, the number of impacts per unit area (one square meter) will be the same.

Let's try it with a different way of visualizing an ideal gas pressure in molecular terms. Let us define pressure as the product of two terms: P=AB. Here, P is the pressure in pascals, A is the frequency of molecular impacts in number per second per square meter, and B is the mean impulse transferred per impulse in Newtons.

Given that both geometric containers have the same pressure and temperature, the 6 m3 surface of the cube will experience more impacts in one second than the 4.83 m3 surface of the sphere. The number of impacts per square meter, however, remains the same. Hence, the pressure is the same.
 
Ahh some of my confusion may have arose because I didn't understand how pressure is calculated mathematically when talking about molecular impacts.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
923
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
5K