Gaseous system: Meaning of this integral eq.

  • Thread starter Thread starter jam_27
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral System
jam_27
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
What is the physical or statistical meaning of the following integral

\int^{a}_{o} g(\vartheta) d(\vartheta) = \int^{\infty}_{a} g(\vartheta) d(\vartheta)

where g(\vartheta) is a Gaussian in \vartheta describing the transition frequency fluctuation in a gaseous system (assume two-level and inhomogeneous) .

\vartheta = \omega_{0} -\omega, where \omega_{0} is the peak frequency and \omega the running frequency.

I understand that the integral finds a point \vartheta = a for which the area under the curve (the Gaussian) between 0 to a and a to \infty are equal.

But is there a statistical meaning to this integral? Does it find something like the most-probable value \vartheta = a? But the most probable value should be \vartheta = 0 in my understanding! So what does the point \vartheta = a tell us?

I will be grateful if somebody can explain this and/or direct me to a reference.

Cheers

Jamy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
angThe integral in question is a type of probability distribution known as a Gaussian or normal distribution. This type of distribution is used to describe the probability of a certain event occurring. In this case, the integral is computing the probability of the transition frequency fluctuation in a gaseous system taking on a particular value (in this case, \vartheta = a). The integral finds a point \vartheta = a for which the area under the curve (the Gaussian) between 0 to a and a to \infty are equal. This is the most probable value of \vartheta - i.e. the value that is most likely to be observed.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top