Gases are kept in the air by their large kinetic energy

AI Thread Summary
Gases remain suspended in the atmosphere due to their high kinetic energy, which allows for frequent collisions that prevent them from falling like macroscopic particles. When considering a single particle, it may appear to fall in a parabolic arc between collisions, but the overall behavior of gas particles is influenced by their interactions in a medium of similar density. The cold temperatures at high altitudes result from radiational cooling and the expansion of gases, which cools them as they rise. Additionally, the average velocity of gas molecules is temperature-dependent, with higher temperatures potentially allowing some molecules to reach escape velocity and leave the atmosphere. This dynamic explains the absence of free hydrogen or helium in the atmosphere, as reactive gases tend to bond and heavier gases can be contained in lower-density environments.
daveed
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
gases are kept in the air by their large kinetic energy, no? if we observed one particle in the atmosphere, however, would we not observe it to fall in a parabolic arc(in between collisions, which keep it propped up) much as a macroscopic particle would?

this just gets me thinking because-with singular particles in a box, wouldn't the particle go towards the bottom of the box? or... if at that level the collision is elastic, it would go back to its original height , but there have the lowest kinetic energy

is that why its cold in high places?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You neglected the fact that there are so many air particles(All kinds of mloecules) so that the "air particles" you mentioned would be in a medium of similar density. It's like pouring water into water; water does not sink through water like matter with high densities.
It's just that air has a very low density, so it doesn't seem that obvious.
 
i said "in between collisions, which keep it propped up". aside from the collisions.
 
daveed said:
is that why its cold in high places?

It's cold in high places for a couple of reasons. One is radiational cooling and another is that gases do work to expand as they climb thereby cooling.
 
Essentially yes, that is correct. But you cannot neglect the temperature. Since the average velocity of the molecules in a gas is determined by the temperature, if the temperature is high enough, the molecule may well have a velocity greater the escape velocity. So the parabolic path could take the molecule into space and free of the Earth's gravitational field. This is one reason why we do not have free Hydrogen or Helium in our atmosphere. The fact that H loves to react, will be another reason we do not find it. However even if it were not reactive any free H would be lost to space.

It is possible of fill an open container with a heavy gas, such as Ar or CO2.
 
I think kuenmao said it right:
Just think of air (gasses in general) as a low density liquid.

I had this feeling often when flying on a plane and watching the wonderous weird cloud formations, if you think of the air atmosphere as a liquid sea covering the whole earth, it doesn't look so weird anymore (yet beautiful anyway :-).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top