Gauge Choice and Consistency with EOMs

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter EuphoGuy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Choice Gauge
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of gauge choice, specifically the Coulomb gauge, in the context of a nonrelativistic theory involving a complex scalar field coupled to a magnetic field. The Lagrangian presented, \(\mathcal{L} = B_i B_i + A_i ( h^*\partial_i h - \partial_i h^* h ) + A_i A_i h^* h\), is not gauge invariant due to missing terms. When applying the Coulomb gauge condition \(\partial_i A_i = 0\), the resulting equations of motion reveal inconsistencies, particularly when taking divergences. The conversation highlights the necessity of ensuring that gauge fixing aligns with the equations of motion to maintain the validity of the Lagrangian.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gauge theories in classical field theory
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics and equations of motion
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic field theory and gauge invariance
  • Proficiency in mathematical notation, particularly in vector calculus and differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of gauge invariance in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the derivation and application of the Coulomb gauge in electromagnetic theory
  • Explore the role of gauge fixing in the context of path integral formulation
  • Investigate the conditions under which a Lagrangian remains valid across different gauge choices
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, gauge theories, and electromagnetic interactions. It is also relevant for graduate students and researchers dealing with Lagrangian formulations in field theory.

EuphoGuy
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello, just had a quick silly question about the coulomb gauge here, though I guess it applies for gauge transformations in general. The problem is, I'm concerned about my gauge choice not being consistent with the equations of motion. For example, suppose I'm working with a nonrelativistic theory describing a single complex scalar coupled to a magnetic field. The part referencing A_i is upto constants and signs

\mathcal{L} = B_i B_i + A_i ( h^*\partial_i h - \partial_i h^* h ) + A_i A_i h^* h

(this isn't gauge invariant because I haven't included the other relevant terms, but these are the only ones that contribute to the EOM)

If I impose the coulomb gauge \partial_i A_i = 0, the gauge fixed lagrangian is

\mathcal{L} = - A_i \nabla^2 A_i + A_i h^* \partial_i h + A_i A_i h^* h

giving equation of motion

\nabla^2 A_i = h^* \partial_i h + 2 A_i h^* h

If I took the divergence of this I would get 0 on the left but not on the right. Is this something one has to worry about then? Fixing gauges that are inconsistent with equations of motion? I think I'm rather just making a silly mistake, since given any old A, there's no reason I can't take it to coulomb gauge.

Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you work with a gauge dependent Lagrangian, how can you arbitrarily fix a gauge? Either the Lagrangian is valid only in a specific gauge (then you have to impose the gauge condition used to derive the Lagrangian) or the Lagrangian is simply not describing electromagnetic fields correctly and you should not use it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
981
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K