Gaussian Functions: Summation of Infinite Variations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the summation of an infinite number of distinct Gaussian functions results in another Gaussian function. Participants argue that this is unlikely, as summing two Gaussian functions leads to a mean that can become infinite, thus suggesting that an infinite sum would not yield a valid Gaussian. The conversation also touches on the challenge of combining finite Gaussian functions, questioning how their sum can still be represented as a Gaussian. There is confusion regarding the mathematical properties of exponentials in relation to Gaussian functions. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the idea that an infinite summation of Gaussian functions does not maintain the Gaussian form.
pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
Is the summation of an infinite number of different (not just different by constants ) Gaussian functions still a gaussian function?

I think not because you can becuase you can just pull an e^(ax^2) from the series where a is any value as small as needed.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You're asking if whatever A_n, mu_n and sigma_n,

\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}A_n\exp{-\frac{(x-\mu_n)^2}{2\sigma_n^2}}=A\exp{-\frac{(x-\mu)^2}{2\sigma^2}}

for some A, mu and sigma. Is that correct?
 
Yeah. Although I think this result dosen't hold?
 
If you sum two gaussians with mean X and Y (think of them as p.d.f.s) then you get one with mean X+Y. So an infinite sum will, in general, have 'infinite mean'. Similarly, infinite standard deviation. So, no, it is not a Gaussian, and in general won't even exist.
 
But if you sum a finite number of different Gaussian than the sum will still be a gaussian? If so how? how can you get e^a+e^b=e^c where a,b,c are functions that satisfy the exponentials being a gaussian.
 
So, you're arguing that if property P holds for a finite number of things (terms, whatever), then it holds for an infinite number of things? Please, back off and think about that for a while. And I'm not arguing that e^a+e^b=e^c. What are a,b,c, for a start?
 
What I am saying or rather asking is that I don't even see how it would work for the finite case. That is for any two different Gaussians
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_function

How do you add them and produce another gaussian?

or even if you take e^2+e^3. Can you make it into e^a for any number a?
 
pivoxa15 said:
What I am saying or rather asking is that I don't even see how it would work for the finite case. That is for any two different Gaussians
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_function

How do you add them and produce another gaussian?

or even if you take e^2+e^3. Can you make it into e^a for any number a?
Well, e^{2} + e^{3} = e^{a} \rightarrow a = ln(e^{2} + e^{3}).
 
Back
Top