Gaussian Wave packet- Griffiths 2.22

lazyluke
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, The problems asks to calculate multiple things for a Gaussian wave packet. Steady state function: psi(x,0)=A*exp(-ax^2).My problem is that I'm stuck at calculating <p^2>.

Homework Equations


<p^2>=Int(|psi|^2*(-1*h^2*d^2/dx^2))dx or
<p^2>=Int(psi*(-1*h^2*d^2/dx^2(psi-conjugate)))dx ?
I am not sure if I can use the expression for |psi|^2- which is already defined and I think calculating the second expression will be wrong since it will give us an answer with i and t sine the exponent from complex conjugate of psi will come down or am i wrong?

The Attempt at a Solution


I know I'm doing something wrong since after i evaluate integrals I get:
<p^2>=4*(2/m)^(1/2)*w^6h^2*(4w^2*(pi/w^6)^(1/2)-2(1/2(pi/w^2)^(1/2)) where w=(a/(1+(2ihat/m)^2)^1/2 which cancels out to 0, somehow I should get ah^2. Now I'm not sure is I should use <p^2>=Int(|psi|^2*(-1*h^2*d^2/dx^2))dx where its a second derivative of |psi|^2 or <p^2>=Int(psi*(-1*h^2*d^2/dx^2(psi-conjugate)))dx where the second derivative is only of the complex conjugate and not the |psi|^2. Or I should not use the w just use the expression defined above? (I thought since w is independent of x it would not matter). Any help will do, just before Sunday evening as its due on Monday morning.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
&lt;p^2&gt;=|A|^2 \int \psi^*(-h^2 \frac{d^2}{dx^2} \psi)dx

Is the correct way to evaluate the expectation value.

As for the integral, I believe there is a very cleaver u-sub to (easily) solve this problem.
 
Sorry just came to me:
Can I use:
<p^2>=m^2*(d^2(<x>^2)/dx^2) or it doesn't work like that?
nvm...<x>=0 :(
 
Ok, I don't know any U-sub, it will help to know about it anyway- but i understand if you don't want to give me a straight answer to my problem- maybe after monday you can tell me how to do that the "easy way", now I am going through that mess and I am left with something like this:
(1/(1+ib)^(1/2))*(1/(1-ib)^(1/2)) where b=2hat/m and i is imaginary number, do those cancel? I cannot solve this and I tried to use one of those equation solvers on internet and won't do it neither... *the second expression suppose to be a complex conjugate of the first one... please help
 
Well \int_{\infty}^{\infty} e^{-ax ^2} dx = \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{\sqrt{a}} = f(a) right?

What's f'(a)?

The function you're trying to integrate looks like:

-2 a h^2 \int_{\infty}^{\infty} -e^{-2 a x^2} + 2 a x^2 e^{-2 a x^2} dx

Which looks sort of like b f(a) + c f'(a) if b and c are just constants, doesn't it?
 
well... yes... but i solved it using int(exp(-ax^2)dx=(pi/a)^(1/2) and int(x^2*exp(-ax^2)dx=1/2(pi/a^3)^(1/2) which i believe yields the same output... I kind of understand the logic here... thanks for the tip as this will be easier then memorizing the common integrals :]... the only problem now is that i have an answer looking like this:

<p^2>=h^2*a*(1/(1-2ihat/m)^(1/2))*(1/(1b2ihat/m)^(1/2)) and basically my question is:

(1/(1-ib)^(1/2)*(1/(1+ib)^(1/2))=1?

I know this is multiplying a complex number by its complex conjugate but does this case works since the complex number is under a square root? or maybe i defined wrong complex conjugate for this? the original expression is:

(1/(1-(2ihat/m))^1/2))) what is its complex conjugate? what does this reduce to? it seems like it should be 1 since the real part is 1/1 so 1^2=1 but how this works in this case with above expression? I hope you can understand which part I am having a problem with...
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top