Gauss's Law with a sphere on and charge on z-axis

AI Thread Summary
To prove that the electric flux equals q/εo for a positive charge on the z-axis, it is essential to apply Gauss's Law correctly. The discussion clarifies that if the electric field is known as a function of coordinates, shifting the charge's position along the z-axis can be accounted for by adjusting the function accordingly. Specifically, this involves using the transformation f(x,y,z) to f(x,y,z-z') to incorporate the charge's displacement. The key takeaway is that the integral ∫E dA can still yield the correct flux result despite the charge's position not being at the origin. Understanding these adjustments is crucial for applying Gauss's Law effectively.
ScandelousWenc
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a question for E&M and I feel like I am over complicating it. As the title says, the is a positive charge on the x-axis and I must prove that flux = q/εo.

Since the charge is on the z-axis, could I just add in a term (z-z') to account for the charge not being at the origin into calculating ∫E dA?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
If you already know an equation is f(x,y,z), then shifting the source a distance z' in the +z direction turns that into f(x,y,z-z') yes.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top