General method for approaching block/rotating pulley/rotating object equations

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Same-same
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General Method
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the general methods for solving problems involving block and rotating pulley systems, emphasizing the importance of free body diagrams (FBDs) and the application of Newton's Second Law. Key equations discussed include torque equations, where τ = RF sin(θ) = Iα, and the net force equation ƩF_{y} = m_{falling object}g - F_{tension} = m_{total}a + (I_{1}α/R_{1}sin(θ)) + (I_{2}α/R_{2}sin(θ)). The conversation highlights the necessity of labeling forces correctly in FBDs and establishing relationships between linear and angular accelerations. Understanding when to include translational velocity in calculations is also clarified, particularly in relation to the observer's frame of reference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law
  • Familiarity with free body diagrams (FBDs)
  • Knowledge of torque and angular acceleration concepts
  • Basic principles of rotational dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Newton's Second Law in rotational dynamics
  • Learn how to construct and analyze free body diagrams for complex systems
  • Explore the relationship between linear and angular motion
  • Investigate the effects of translational velocity on rotating objects
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and mechanics who are working with rotational systems, particularly those dealing with pulleys, tension, and dynamics of rotating objects.

Same-same
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Not asking about a specific problem, but general methods. I'm having trouble with problems that usually involve tension, rotating objects, rotating pulleys, and one block free to fall due to gravity. I'm not asking for help with a specific problem, but with this approach in general. It seems like it should be simple, but for whatever reason I always freeze up whenever I try to solve one of these problems, so I'm trying to better understand rotation.

My current line of reasoning is to use force diagrams and then
Since \tau = RF sin (\theta) =I\alpha,
F =((I\alpha)/(R sin(\theta)))

Since the net force is generally provided by one or more objects allowed to fall
ƩF_{y} (generally equal to m_{falling object}g- F_{tension} )=m_{total}a + ((I _{1} \alpha)/ (R_{1} sin (\theta)))
+ ((I _{2} \alpha))/ (R_{2} sin (\theta) ))... and so on for any of the other I\alpha and ma.
I will then generally plug in a/R for \alpha

At this point, I'm generally not sure what to do. Possible ideas are to do a sum of torques equation, or to attempt to solve for Tension in the x direction.

Another thing that confuses me is when to include translational velocity for a rotating object in my equations.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The general method is to
1. Draw free body diagrams (FBDs) for each identifiable component of the system. For example, if you have two masses hanging on either side of a pulley that is not assumed massless, you will need three separate FBDs, two for the hanging masses and one for the pulley.
2. Identify the forces in each diagram and label them appropriately. This means use different labels for different forces, however if ##F_1## in one FBD has a reaction counterpart in another, then they should be labeled the same and point in opposite directions in the diagram; this is the case most notably with tension. Also note that the tension on either side of a pulley with mass (and hence moment of inertia) has to be labeled differently, otherwise the pulley will not acquire angular acceleration.
3. Based on each of the FBDs write Newton's Second Law ##F_{net,i}=m_i a_i## or ##\tau_{net,i}=I_i\alpha_i## for each of the components of the system.
4. Establish relations between linear accelerations and between linear accelerations and angular accelerations. These will depend on how the total system is assembled.
5. The Newton's Second Law equations should be sufficient to solve for the unknowns.

You include translational velocity for a rotating object when the center of mass of the object is translating relative to your frame of reference. For example, if you are riding a unicycle, you do not include the translational velocity in the calculation of its wheel's kinetic energy. If you are standing by the side of the road and watch the unicycle go by, you do.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
9K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K