General question about linear momentum.

AI Thread Summary
Momentum is conserved in an isolated system when the net force acting on it is zero. However, gravity can cause a change in momentum, leading to confusion in problems involving free-fall. In certain scenarios, such as brief interactions between two objects at a constant elevation, momentum can still be considered conserved despite gravitational forces. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding specific conditions under which momentum conservation applies. Clarifying these conditions can help resolve the confusion surrounding momentum in the presence of gravity.
-Dragoon-
Messages
308
Reaction score
7
This is the one thing I seem to still be very confused about. From what I understood, momentum is conserved if the net force on an isolated system, that is \frac{dP}{dt}, is equal to 0. But in some problems that I've worked through, I've always assumed the force due to gravity causes a change in momentum and thus the momentum of the system is not conserved, but my TA for some reason told me to just "ignore gravity" and always assume momentum is conserved.

My question: If momentum is conserved only if the rate of change of momentum with respect to time (net force) is equal to 0, then why is it for some problems the book and my TA's proceed to solve a problem where an object is in free-fall as if momentum is conserved? Doesn't gravity cause a change in momentum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
-Dragoon- said:
My question: If momentum is conserved only if the rate of change of momentum with respect to time (net force) is equal to 0, then why is it for some problems the book and my TA's proceed to solve a problem where an object is in free-fall as if momentum is conserved? Doesn't gravity cause a change in momentum?
It might help if you could give an example of such a problem. There may be particular circumstances that allow conservation of momentum to be used (such as two objects interacting over a vanishingly small time interval at a given elevation in the gravity field).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top