B General question about series limits and strong lines of the emissions spectrum

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter James Kahn
  • Start date Start date
James Kahn
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
General question about series limits and strong lines of the emissions spectrum.
I have been learning about the emissions spectrum for the periodic table of elements and I noticed for example that the NIST database for the strong lines does not include the series limits for hydrogen. For example the NIST does not include 364.6 nm for the Balmer series limit and 820.4 nm for the Paschen series limit found in the wikipedia article etc.... Can you explain why these are not included on the NIST list of strong lines?

This brings me to my next question. Do all of the other elements on the periodic table also have series limits that are not included on the NIST database of strong lines? If so can you point me to where I can find a list of the series limits for the rest of the periodic table? Maybe I am missing something fundamental and simple? It just seems that I can't find a straightforward answer to this question in spite of reading a lot of rudimentary articles about the emission lines. If there is a good book that answers these specific questions I would also love to know about it. Thanks so much for your time and expertise.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ASD) lists “strong lines”, actual discrete, measurable transitions between bound states (energy levels) where an electron moves from one level to another, emitting or absorbing a photon.

A series limit is not a discrete line; it’s the accumulation point (or asymptotic limit) where the series of lines converge as the electron gets closer to ionization.
 
jedishrfu said:
The NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ASD) lists “strong lines”, actual discrete, measurable transitions between bound states (energy levels) where an electron moves from one level to another, emitting or absorbing a photon.

A series limit is not a discrete line; it’s the accumulation point (or asymptotic limit) where the series of lines converge as the electron gets closer to ionization.
Thanks this helps some. So do all elements on the periodic table have series limits or convergent points like hydrogen? And if so where can I find a list of the series limits? Also you said it is not a discrete point or line but the series limits I did find for hydrogen on wiki are single precise measured wavelengths. So I am a but confused. Thanks again for your help.
 
It's much harder to measure the series limit on multi-electron atoms and likely of less interest than the hydrogen case because when doing the measurement you're not sure of what electron you've ionized.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Likes Delta Prime
Thanks for the reply.This makes more sense. So basically you are saying that it is not possible to measure the series limits for other elements like oxygen, carbon etc..... and the data does not exist?
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Back
Top