General Relativistic Effects on an Electro-Magnet

jartsa
Messages
1,582
Reaction score
141
Let's say there's a current going around in a superconducting loop in vacuum. Then the loop gets buried in huge amount of matter, which has the same magnetic susceptibility as vacuum. (when not affected by gravity the matter has the same magnetic susceptibility as vacuum)

Will the magnetic field change near the loop?
Will the magnetic field change far away from the loop?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. The magnetic field is coupled to the connection which is itself coupled to the gravitational field.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
jartsa said:
Let's say there's a current going around in a superconducting loop in vacuum. Then the loop gets buried in huge amount of matter, which has the same magnetic susceptibility as vacuum. (when not affected by gravity the matter has the same magnetic susceptibility as vacuum)

Will the magnetic field change near the loop?
Will the magnetic field change far away from the loop?
Model the "huge amount of matter" as a spherical shell of mass M and radius R, and consider the situation before the current loop is introduced. Outside the shell the field will be Schwarzschild, with metric

ds2 = (1 - 2M/r) dt2 - (1 - 2M/r)-1 dr2 - r2 d2Ω

Inside, the field will be flat. The boundary condition at the shell is that its intrinsic curvature must be the same as viewed from inside and outside. Choose inner coordinates to match the outer ones. What's different is grr. The inner metric will be

ds2 = (1 - 2M/R) dt2 - dr2 - r2 d2Ω

which is just the Minkowski metric with a rescaled t coordinate.

Now introduce the current loop. The B field will be continuous across the shell, so both inside and outside, the B field is that of a magnetic dipole. However the dipole moments differ, because an inside observer will rescale his t coordinate to match Minkowski.

The result is simply time dilation - from the outside the currents appear slower. The external effect of the mass shell is a reduced apparent magnetic dipole, and correspondingly a B field that is reduced.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top