General Relativity-surface gravity in killing horizon

nikhilb1997
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
Prove the following-

\kappa^2=-1/2(\bigtriangledown_{\mu}V_{\nu})(\bigtriangledown^{\mu}V^{\nu})
Given, the following,
\chi^{\lambda}\bigtriangledown_{\lambda}\chi^{\nu}=-\kappa\chi^{\nu}
\bigtriangledown_{(\mu}\chi_{\nu)}=0
\chi_{[\mu}\bigtriangledown_{\nu}\chi_{\theta]}=0

Homework Equations



\kappa^2=-1/2(\bigtriangledown_{\mu}V_{\nu})(\bigtriangledown^{\mu}V^{\nu})
\chi^{\lambda}\bigtriangledown_{\lambda}\chi^{\nu}=-\kappa\chi^{\nu}
\bigtriangledown_{(\mu}\chi_{\nu)}=0
\chi_{[\mu}\bigtriangledown_{\nu}\chi_{\theta]}=03. The Attempt at a Solution
I do not know how to start as the equation to prove has a raised covariant derivative. I tried to use the metric to lower it but I got stuck at how the metric would affect the equation. So please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nikhilb1997 said:
1. Homework Statement
Prove the following-

\kappa^2=-1/2(\bigtriangledown_{\mu}V_{\nu})(\bigtriangledown^{\mu}V^{\nu})
Given, the following,
\chi^{\lambda}\bigtriangledown_{\lambda}\chi^{\nu}=-\kappa\chi^{\nu}
\bigtriangledown_{(\mu}\chi_{\nu)}=0
\chi_{[\mu}\bigtriangledown_{\nu}\chi_{\theta]}=0



Homework Equations



\kappa^2=-1/2(\bigtriangledown_{\mu}V_{\nu})(\bigtriangledown^{\mu}V^{\nu})
\chi^{\lambda}\bigtriangledown_{\lambda}\chi^{\nu}=-\kappa\chi^{\nu}
\bigtriangledown_{(\mu}\chi_{\nu)}=0
\chi_{[\mu}\bigtriangledown_{\nu}\chi_{\theta]}=0


3. The Attempt at a Solution
I do not know how to start as the equation to prove has a raised covariant derivative. I tried to use the metric to lower it but I got stuck at how the metric would affect the equation. So please help.

Take \chi_{[\mu}\bigtriangledown_{\nu}\chi_{\theta]}=0, use \bigtriangledown_{(\mu}\chi_{\nu)}=0 to get rid of half of the terms, then contract with \nabla^{\mu} \chi^{\nu}
 
clamtrox said:
Take \chi_{[\mu}\bigtriangledown_{\nu}\chi_{\theta]}=0, use \bigtriangledown_{(\mu}\chi_{\nu)}=0 to get rid of half of the terms, then contract with \nabla^{\mu} \chi^{\nu}
Thanks a lot. I did the first two steps but I didn't know what to do next. Contracting gave the required result.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top