Generalized coordinates - Rotating pendulum

AI Thread Summary
In the context of a rotating pendulum, the angle of rotation about the axis is not considered a generalized coordinate because it does not contribute to the dynamics of the system in the same way as other coordinates. The discussion highlights that if the rotation around the axis is not influenced by gravity, this coordinate becomes cyclic, meaning its conjugate momentum is conserved. The relationship between the angle and angular velocity is crucial, especially when determining the Hamiltonian for the system. The confusion arises from whether to include the angle in the Hamiltonian formulation, which depends on the constancy of angular velocity. Understanding these concepts is essential for accurately modeling the dynamics of the rotating pendulum.
assed
Messages
26
Reaction score
1
My question is kinda simple but it has been causing me some trouble for a while. In the problem of the pendulum rotating about an axis, why isn't the angle of rotation about the axis a generalized coordinate? The doubt appears when i try to write the hamiltonian for the system and i don't know if i include the term relative to that angle.
How that's related to the fact that the angular velocity is or not constant.
Thanks in advance.
( The problem considered is of a simple pendulum, but with its axis of oscillation rotating)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the orientation of that axis? If rotation around it is not influenced by gravity, the coordinate is cyclic (I think this is what you are looking for?) and its time-derivative is conserved.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top