MHB Generalized Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers.

meow91006
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
[h=2][/h]
Can you help me prove this theorem regarding Fibonacci and Lucas numbers?

Theorem.

Let m,r ϵ Z and n be non-zero integer. Then

U2mn
+r ≡ (-1)mn Ur (mod Um) and

V2mn
+r ≡ (-1)mn Vr (mod Um).Im not that good at proving. This type of congruence is much harder than what I read in our book, but I badly need the proof for this one, even just this one, to understand better Fiboancci and Lucas numbers.

I'd be glad to hear from you soon.
Thank you very much!

 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
meow91006 said:
Can you help me prove this theorem regarding Fibonacci and Lucas numbers?

Theorem.

Let m,r ϵ Z and n be non-zero integer. Then

U2mn
+r ≡ (-1)mn Ur (mod Um) and

V2mn
+r ≡ (-1)mn Vr (mod Um).Im not that good at proving. This type of congruence is much harder than what I read in our book, but I badly need the proof for this one, even just this one, to understand better Fiboancci and Lucas numbers.

I'd be glad to hear from you soon.
Thank you very much!



That is not a question as it stands, please post the full question.

CB
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Back
Top