Generating Energy from Molecular Motion

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter painter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Machine Motion
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of generating energy from the perpetual random motion of molecules and the feasibility of creating a perpetual motion machine based on this idea. Participants explore the implications of molecular motion in the context of thermodynamics and energy conversion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why perpetual motion machines cannot be created from the energy of molecules in random motion.
  • Another participant explains that while molecular motion is continuous, it contains a finite amount of energy that cannot sustain perpetual motion once utilized.
  • There is a discussion about the conservation of energy, noting that using energy from molecular motion for work results in a loss of that energy from the motion itself.
  • A participant mentions existing machines that convert thermal energy from molecular motion into other forms of work, such as Stirling engines and thermionic generators, but emphasizes that these do not constitute perpetual motion.
  • One participant expresses concern about the appropriateness of advanced material for a 9th grader.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that perpetual motion machines are impossible due to the finite nature of energy in molecular motion and the principles of energy conservation. However, there are differing views on the implications of using molecular motion for energy conversion and the appropriateness of certain explanations for younger students.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the limitations of understanding related to energy conversion and the nature of molecular motion, as well as the challenges in conveying complex concepts to younger audiences.

painter
Messages
4
Reaction score
4
This question really troubles me.
Since we all know that the molecules are in perpetual random motion, why can't we make a perpetual motion machine by using molecular's always-moving energy??

I‘m a Grade 9 student and I'm unsure about this.

:doh::doh::doh:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
Hi @painter and welcome to PF!

You seem to be aware that perpetual motion machines are impossible, which is good. You just need to recognize that the word "perpetual" is the key. In the case of random motion of molecules, any such collection of molecules only has a finite amount of energy in it due to random motion. You could conceivably convert that finite amount of energy into some other form to do useful work (though even then there are other limitations involved), but that wouldn't be "perpetual" motion because once that finite amount of energy was used up, you would be done: there would be no more energy left and whatever you were doing with the energy would stop. The reason the random motion of molecules is "perpetual" is that the energy in that random motion isn't being converted into anything else; it's not doing any useful work at all.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DeBangis21 and painter
painter said:
it MUST have lost some of its energy when being converted into something else (is that?)
That's right: by conservation of energy, if you use some of the energy contained in the random motion of molecules for something else, that energy is no longer there in the random motion of molecules.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DeBangis21, Dale and painter
PeterDonis said:
Moderator's note: Thread moved to Classical Physics forum.
And thank you for moving the thread to a right place-----I'm new here and I really have no idea where to put it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DeBangis21
PeterDonis said:
That's right: by conservation of energy, if you use some of the energy contained in the random motion of molecules for something else, that energy is no longer there in the random motion of molecules.
I got it !! Thank you veeeeery much😃😃😃🤩
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DeBangis21, Dale and berkeman
painter said:
I got it !! Thank you veeeeery much😃😃😃🤩
You're welcome!
 
painter said:
Since we all know that the molecules are in perpetual random motion, why can't we make a perpetual motion machine by using molecular's always-moving energy??
We can already make machines that take advantage of a "molecule's always-moving energy". That's thermal energy, and machines that convert heat into other forms of work already exist. A stirling cycle engine does converts heat into mechanical motion, and thermionic generators can convert heat into electricity (at its most basic level, so does a thermocouple).

None of this is perpetual motion, however. When you extract heat energy from a material, the motion of its molecules decreases.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DeBangis21 and Vanadium 50
  • #10
While I like Feynman's treatment, I would not suggest it to a 9th grader.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
15K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K