High School Generating Energy from Molecular Motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter painter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Machine Motion
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impossibility of creating a perpetual motion machine using the random motion of molecules. Participants clarify that while molecular motion is constant, it possesses a finite amount of energy that can be converted into useful work, but this process depletes the energy available in that motion. Tools such as Stirling cycle engines and thermionic generators are mentioned as existing technologies that convert thermal energy into mechanical or electrical energy, but none of these processes achieve perpetual motion due to the conservation of energy principle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical physics principles, particularly the laws of thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with energy conservation concepts
  • Knowledge of thermal energy and its conversion methods
  • Basic comprehension of molecular motion and kinetic theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of thermodynamics, focusing on the first and second laws
  • Learn about the operation and efficiency of Stirling cycle engines
  • Explore thermionic generators and their applications in energy conversion
  • Investigate the kinetic theory of gases and its implications for molecular motion
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students, educators, and anyone interested in classical physics, particularly those exploring concepts related to energy conversion and thermodynamics.

painter
Messages
4
Reaction score
4
This question really troubles me.
Since we all know that the molecules are in perpetual random motion, why can't we make a perpetual motion machine by using molecular's always-moving energy??

I‘m a Grade 9 student and I'm unsure about this.

:doh::doh::doh:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
Hi @painter and welcome to PF!

You seem to be aware that perpetual motion machines are impossible, which is good. You just need to recognize that the word "perpetual" is the key. In the case of random motion of molecules, any such collection of molecules only has a finite amount of energy in it due to random motion. You could conceivably convert that finite amount of energy into some other form to do useful work (though even then there are other limitations involved), but that wouldn't be "perpetual" motion because once that finite amount of energy was used up, you would be done: there would be no more energy left and whatever you were doing with the energy would stop. The reason the random motion of molecules is "perpetual" is that the energy in that random motion isn't being converted into anything else; it's not doing any useful work at all.
 
  • Like
Likes DeBangis21 and painter
painter said:
it MUST have lost some of its energy when being converted into something else (is that?)
That's right: by conservation of energy, if you use some of the energy contained in the random motion of molecules for something else, that energy is no longer there in the random motion of molecules.
 
  • Like
Likes DeBangis21, Dale and painter
PeterDonis said:
Moderator's note: Thread moved to Classical Physics forum.
And thank you for moving the thread to a right place-----I'm new here and I really have no idea where to put it.
 
PeterDonis said:
That's right: by conservation of energy, if you use some of the energy contained in the random motion of molecules for something else, that energy is no longer there in the random motion of molecules.
I got it !! Thank you veeeeery much😃😃😃🤩
 
  • Like
Likes DeBangis21, Dale and berkeman
painter said:
I got it !! Thank you veeeeery much😃😃😃🤩
You're welcome!
 
painter said:
Since we all know that the molecules are in perpetual random motion, why can't we make a perpetual motion machine by using molecular's always-moving energy??
We can already make machines that take advantage of a "molecule's always-moving energy". That's thermal energy, and machines that convert heat into other forms of work already exist. A stirling cycle engine does converts heat into mechanical motion, and thermionic generators can convert heat into electricity (at its most basic level, so does a thermocouple).

None of this is perpetual motion, however. When you extract heat energy from a material, the motion of its molecules decreases.
 
  • Like
Likes DeBangis21 and Vanadium 50
  • #10
While I like Feynman's treatment, I would not suggest it to a 9th grader.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
858
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
14K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K