Generating Mechanical Excitations on Solid Masses (Earth)

AI Thread Summary
Alternative methods for generating mechanical excitations on solid masses, such as the Earth, include modifying a pneumatic jackhammer to control its frequency. This approach involves replacing the chisel with a "thumper" plate and developing a custom control unit to achieve desired resonance frequencies. It's crucial to first determine the frequency range needed, as the effectiveness of the jackhammer depends on the resonant frequency of the ground material. The discussion highlights the potential for innovative solutions beyond traditional methods like seismic activities and explosives. Overall, exploring these alternatives could enhance the understanding of Earth's resonance frequencies.
Victordon
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Could someone please assist me with other ways to generate mechanical excitations on a solid mass(e.g earth) apart from seismic activities, nuclear detonation, use of dynamite and percusion( like use of hammer on rocks)?

The essence of this is to actually find out the resonance frequencies of Earth formations using these other means to try and achieve these frequencies.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Curiously enough, the methods you've already described are such to induce very strong 'shock waves' through the material, which is an ideal investigative method.

One thought that comes to mind is modifying a pneumatic jackhammer. The modification would consist of replacing the chisel end with a "thumper" plate(already exists) and being able to control the frequency of the jackhammer(likely you would need to build some sort of custom made control unit) In any event, should the resonant frequecy of the ground material be higher than the maximum frequency of the jackhammer it will not work.
So, I would study first on the frequency range you may need, then, throw someone a thousand dollars to construct a custom made variable frequency jackhammer.
 
lol. Thanks for this incite. looks like you could make do with more than a thousand dollars...
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top