Generic Soliton Solution Periodicity: Restrictions & Examples

Einj
Messages
464
Reaction score
59
Hello everyone, I have a question regarding the possible periodicity of time in a generic metric.
Suppose that for some reason I have a solution to Einstein's equations of the kind (in Euclidean time):

$$
ds^2_E=+f(r)dt_E^2+\frac{dr^2}{g(r)}+r^2(dx^2+dy^2).
$$

Am I always allowed to assign some periodicity to the Eucledean time ##t_E## or is there any restriction?

For example, I know that there is a particular solution called "thermal AdS" which is nothing but the usual AdS metric (i.e. not a black hole with an horizon) to which a periodic time has been assigned.

When can I do that?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A periodic euclidean time is equivalent to gluing the two ends of the path integral that prepares your state. This is then equivalent to preparing a thermal state. So periodic Euclidean time is always going to prepare a thermal state via the path integral. Whether or not it is a black hole depends on the actual path integral.

Note when I say path integral I mean that of the boundary CFT. So yes AdS and thermal AdS are the same as far as space-time geometry is concerned but in the latter the CFT is prepared in a thermal state. Black holes in the bulk are also dual to thermal CFTs (at least in most examples e.g. BTZ).

EDIT: I forgot to mention that the path integrals for thermal AdS and BTZ are closely related. In the former the path integral is a torus with one circle parametrized by Euclidean time and the other by the angular coordinate; the latter can be obtained simply by switching the roles of these two coordinates on the torus.
 
Last edited:
Thanks a lot for your reply! I guess my question was: since periodic Eucledean time always means thermal state for the boundary CFT, does this mean that if I have a generic soliton solution (no horizon) and I impose the time to be periodic this is going to be a thermal state? Do I have any constrain on the solution in order to be allowed to impose periodic time conditions?

Thanks a gain!
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top