Geodesics and their linear equations

Biest
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Hi,

So I am going over on how to find a geodesic from any metric, esp. on a 2-sphere. I have been looking at my lecture notes and am confused as to how my professor solves for the equation in terms of the variables, i.e. (\theta , \phi). If i use the 2-sphere as an example here where the geodesic is given by:

\ddot{\phi} = -2\cot \theta \dot{\phi} \dot{\theta}

\ddot{\theta} = \sin \theta \cos \theta \dot{\phi}^2

So from the metric we get a first dervative

1 = \dot{\theta}^2 + \sin^2 \theta \dot{\phi}^2

My prof then goes on and simply states that

\frac{1}{\sin^2 \theta} \frac{d}{d\tau} (\sin^2 \theta \dot{\phi}) = 0

Where does the last equation come from... in lecture he simply stated it and moved on from there with

(\sin^2 \theta \dot{\phi}) = l = constant

I really thinking i got a bit rusty on this since mechanics lies two years in the past.Thank you very much any help in advance.

Cheers,

Biest
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Multiply the first equation with \sin^2\theta and you will arrive to the wanted result.
 
Thanks... I forgot to add one more question... What do we do when we have three geodesics? Just choose one and solve from there?
 
Finding the geodesics is a really hard problem. In general you can not find a closed form solution for them. But if you have a killing field, i.e. \nabla_\alpha\,\xi_\beta+\nabla_\beta\,\xi_\alpha=0 then you have a constant along the geodesic, i.e. \xi_\alpha\,u^\alpha=C where u^\alpha is tangent to the geodesic.
 
Rainbow Child said:
Finding the geodesics is a really hard problem. In general you can not find a closed form solution for them. But if you have a killing field, i.e. \nabla_\alpha\,\xi_\beta+\nabla_\beta\,\xi_\alpha=0 then you have a constant along the geodesic, i.e. \xi_\alpha\,u^\alpha=C where u^\alpha is tangent to the geodesic.

I know it is hard... i had to derive the conditions for homework and was stuck on the derivative of g_{\mu \nu} anyway. At the moment we have just done polar coordinates and the 2-sphere. and now we just moved into particle orbits, which i have to work through as well cause i am trying how the Killing vector works there. I am starting to get it, but it is taking me a while already.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top