Geodesics: Constant Velocity & Affine Parameterization

  • Thread starter Thread starter latentcorpse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geodesics Homework
AI Thread Summary
Affinely parameterized geodesics satisfy the condition \nabla_XX=0, indicating that they maintain constant velocity. When parametrized by \lambda, the velocity is expressed as \frac{dX^a(\lambda)}{d\lambda}=\dot{X}^a. The geodesic equation leads to the conclusion that \nabla_{\lambda}\dot{X}^a=0, which implies that the acceleration \ddot{X}^a is zero. Consequently, the velocity remains constant along the geodesic. This demonstrates the relationship between affine parameterization and constant velocity in geodesics.
latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
Affinely parameterised geodesics satisfy \nabla_XX=0
Why does this mean they have constant velocity?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If we parametrize the geodesic by \lambda then the velocity is given by \frac{dX^a(\lambda)}{d\lambda}=\dot{X}^a

Thus, \nabla_{\lambda}\dot{X}^a=\dot{X}^b\nabla_{b}\dot{X}^a=\dot{X}^b\left(\partial_b \dot{X}^a+\Gamma_{bc}^a \dot{X}^c\right)=\ddot{X}^a+\Gamma_{bc}^a\dot{X}^b\dot{X}^c=0 since it is the geodesic equation. Therefore the velocity is constant along the geodesic.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top