Calculating Geometric Mean Annual Increase: Cable TV Subscribers 1990-2000

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the geometric mean annual increase of cable TV subscribers from 1990 to 2000, where subscribers grew from 9.19 million to 54.87 million. The incorrect initial calculations suggested a geometric mean of 22.46 million and a percentage increase of 19.56%. However, it was clarified that the geometric mean does not represent the annual increase, and the correct annual increase is actually 4.569 million. The proper method involves taking the ratio of the 2000 subscribers to the 1990 subscribers and calculating the tenth root for the annual percentage increase. Ultimately, the distinction between the geometric mean and the arithmetic mean is emphasized, with the focus on the annual increase being crucial.
PARAJON
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have a question that I would like your assistance to see if I have the correct info:


In 1990 there were 9.19 million cable TV subscribers. By 2000 the number of subscribers increased to 54.87 million. What is the geometric mean annual increase for the period ?


Answer:

(9.19*54.87)^(1/2) = 22.46 million


I would appreciate your help in this matter to come up with the correct answer.

I also have another possible answer of 19.56%


Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neither of those answers has any hope of being correct.

In the first case, "(9.19*54.87)^(1/2) = 22.46 million" you are averaging the number of viewers, not the annual increase in the number of viewers.
In the second case, you have a percentage and the problem asks for "annual increase" not percentage annual increase.

IF the problem had asked for "arithmetic" mean (or just "mean") it would be easy: the total increase from 1990 to 2000 is 54.87- 9.19= 45.68 million which would be a mean annual increase for those 10 years of 45.68/10= 4.569 million.

Letting a1, a2, ... , an, be the actual annual increase, you want a number a such that a1*a2*...*a10= a10 AND a1+ ...+ a10= 45.68. Since sums and products don't combine nicely, I don't see any way of getting that.
 
the 19.56% answer is the annual increase.

9.19 * x^10 = 54.87
x = (54.87/9.19)^(1/10)

which is 1.195644 ~ 19.56%.

22.46 is the geometric mean of 9.19 and 54.87 but i don't see how that is important here.
 
Take the ratio (R) of no. of 2000 over no. in 1990. The answer you want is R1/10. I'll let you do the arithmetic.
 
"the 19.56% answer is the annual increase."

No, it's the annual percentage increase. The (arithmetic) mean annual increase is 4.569 million as I said. There's a big difference.

"Take the ratio (R) of no. of 2000 over no. in 1990. The answer you want is R1/10. I'll let you do the arithmetic."
That is 1.1956= "1+r" where r is the annual percentage increase. I don't see how that could be called the "geometric mean annual increase".
 
HallsofIvy said:
No, it's the annual percentage increase.

you are right, of course :)
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top