Geometrical description of a subset

  • Thread starter Thread starter dlevanchuk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometrical
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the geometric description of subspaces in R3. It establishes that the subset defined by {x: x3 = 2x1 - x2} corresponds to the plane described by the equation 2x1 - x2 - x3 = 0. Additionally, the subset {x: aTx = 0}, where a = [1; 0; 0], defines the yz-plane, as it requires the x-coordinate to be zero while allowing non-zero y and z coordinates. The key takeaway is that rearranging the set notation into familiar forms reveals the geometric nature of the subsets.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector notation and operations in R3
  • Familiarity with the concept of subspaces in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of plane equations in three-dimensional space
  • Basic skills in manipulating algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of planes in R3 and their equations
  • Learn about vector spaces and subspaces in linear algebra
  • Explore the concept of linear transformations and their geometric interpretations
  • Practice rearranging equations to identify geometric shapes in R2 and R3
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians, and anyone interested in understanding geometric representations of vector subsets in three-dimensional space.

dlevanchuk
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Could somebody explain to me please how to figure out a geometric description of a subspace? I understand how to check wether the set of vectors is a subset, but how t ogive them a geometric description??

lets say i have a subset in R3 {x: x3 = 2x1-x2}

why the G.D. is a plane with an equation 2x1-x2-x3 = 0??

or if I have subset {x: aTx = 0}, where a = [1;0; 0] (R3 again), the G.D is a plane yz... huh? how come? :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the first example you just need to rearrange the set notation so that it reads:
{x: 2x1-x2-x3 = 0}. This is a plane, just as an equation like y-x+1=0 might describe a line in R2.

In the second case, I'm not sure what you mean by T, but I'm assuming that by aTx you just mean the vector multiplication of x by the transpose of a. In this case, note that in order to satisfy the equation, x can have non-zero y and z coordinates, but must have a zero x coordinate...ie. the equation defines the plane formed by the y and z-axes.

Note I have used a bold font for vectors...life can get a bit confusing if you use the same notation for vectors and points!
 
mrbohn1 said:
In the first example you just need to rearrange the set notation so that it reads:
{x: 2x1-x2-x3 = 0}. This is a plane, just as an equation like y-x+1=0 might describe a line in R2.

In the second case, I'm not sure what you mean by T, but I'm assuming that by aTx you just mean the vector multiplication of x by the transpose of a. In this case, note that in order to satisfy the equation, x can have non-zero y and z coordinates, but must have a zero x coordinate...ie. the equation defines the plane formed by the y and z-axes.

Note I have used a bold font for vectors...life can get a bit confusing if you use the same notation for vectors and points!


Gotcha. So i just have to look at the subset, and rearrange the equation, until it will look familiar (ie plane in 3d or a line in 2d..)

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K