Calculating the Radius of Curvature for a Deflected Beam

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jerry1989
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Geometry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the radius of curvature (R) for a deflected beam under a force, with specific values given for the beam's length (L0 = 120mm) and horizontal displacement (X = 55mm). The challenge arises from the inability to measure vertical displacement (Y), leading to the assumption that the beam's curvature resembles a circle. Participants note that traditional small deflection theories are inadequate for highly flexible beams, necessitating the use of large deflection theories instead. The conversation highlights the relevance of elastica theory in this context, which is less commonly addressed in structural engineering. The problem is ultimately framed as a complex trigonometry challenge.
Jerry1989
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey Guys,

I'm stuck with this problem, we want to compare the curve of a beam to it's horziontal deflection, it's for an experiment we're performing on a very elastic beam.

In the attachment you see a flexibel beam getting deflected by a force, this causes displacement x. We don't know (or can't measure) displacement in vertical y-direction.
However, we can assume the beam bends in a way that it's curvature resembles a circle with radius R.

Now, if we have an L0 of 120mm and an X-displacement of 55mm. What would that radius R be?

So far, I've tried an arc-length menthod, and I tried looking at the circles, but I just can't figure it out. Can you guys help me out?
 

Attachments

  • Knipsel.JPG
    Knipsel.JPG
    12.8 KB · Views: 489
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Most beam theories which are used in structural analysis are what are known as 'small deflection' theories. Because of the mathematics involved with relating the bending moment in the beam to its curvature, a great simplification in calculating the deflection of the beam is obtained when the slope of the beam is very small. For very flexible beams, where the slopes can no longer be considered small, the 'small deflection' theories can no longer be applied, and more complicated 'large deflection' theories must be used for analysis.

What you are looking for is called 'elastica theory':

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastica_theory

For obvious reasons, most structural engineers don't deal with such theories, but some engineers, like those involved in laying submarine pipelines, may be familiar with the necessary mathematics.
 
thanks, I'm looking into it.
So far, it's looking t be more of a trigonometry problem. But a tricky one..
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top